Hi emeline,
I think there may be a minor language problem. If you mean the
"variation" rather than the "variance" in survival, you may simply
want a test of proportions.
Jim
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:48 PM, emeline mourocq wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I investigate survival until the following year (0
] Fligner-Killeen test on binary data
That's not an R question but a stats question, but I wouldn't do it. For one
thing: The variance of binary data is a function of the mean, so the
research question is dubious in the first place. Secondly, the test is based
on ranking and comparin
Peter: Bravo!
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:10 AM, peter dalgaard wrote:
> That's not an R question but a stats question, but I wouldn't do it. For one
> thing: The variance of binary data is a function of the mean, so the research
> question is dubious in the first place. Secondly, the test is ba
That's not an R question but a stats question, but I wouldn't do it. For one
thing: The variance of binary data is a function of the mean, so the research
question is dubious in the first place. Secondly, the test is based on ranking
and comparing absolute differences from the group median, whic
Hello,
I investigate survival until the following year (0,1) and I wish to test if
the variance in survival for two or more groups are significantly different
from each other.
I read that the Fligner-Killeen test is a non-parametric test which is very
robust against departures from normalit
5 matches
Mail list logo
