I thought the difference is to big too, so I tried both "breslow" and
"efron" with same different result, and "exact" goes for ever, which is
strange as I'm only using one dependent varable here. Could be that
n~50.000, and I haven't got the most powerful computer either. I'm not
aiming to get equa
That is a larger difference in p-values than I would expect due to
numerical differences and stopping criteria. My guess is that you are
running across the different approximations for tied failure times. If
so, you will get better agreement with SPSS by using method="breslow" in
coxph().
Kåre Edvardsen wrote:
My apologies for asking slightly about SPSS in addition to R...
Could not find an exact answer in the archives on whether R and SPSS may
give different p-vals when output for coeffs and conf-intervals are the
same.
Amyway, a colleague and I are doing a very simple coxreg
My apologies for asking slightly about SPSS in addition to R...
Could not find an exact answer in the archives on whether R and SPSS may
give different p-vals when output for coeffs and conf-intervals are the
same.
Amyway, a colleague and I are doing a very simple coxreg analyses and
get the same
4 matches
Mail list logo