Re: [R] Difference between spec.pgram & spec.ar

2012-04-09 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On 09/04/2012 18:52, Bert Gunter wrote: On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Bazman76 wrote: Yes I agree, there may be something pathalogical in the way at least one of the models handles the data. That's why I was trying to get a better handle on how the two functions spec.prgm() and spec.ar() wor

Re: [R] Difference between spec.pgram & spec.ar

2012-04-09 Thread Bert Gunter
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Bazman76 wrote: > Yes I agree, there may be something pathalogical in the way at least one of > the models handles the data.  That's why I was trying to get a better handle > on how the two functions spec.prgm() and spec.ar() work. > > The data has been processed by

Re: [R] Difference between spec.pgram & spec.ar

2012-04-09 Thread Bazman76
Yes I agree, there may be something pathalogical in the way at least one of the models handles the data. That's why I was trying to get a better handle on how the two functions spec.prgm() and spec.ar() work. The data has been processed by a wavelet analysis, so what you are seeing as the "raw" d

Re: [R] Difference between spec.pgram & spec.ar

2012-04-09 Thread Bazman76
oops sorry n 08.04.2012 20:39, Bazman76 wrote: > Hi there, > > Can someone explain what the difference between spec.pgram and spec.ar is? > > I understand that they attempt to do the same thing one using an AR > estimation of the underlying series to estimate teh sensity the other > using >

Re: [R] Difference between spec.pgram & spec.ar

2012-04-09 Thread peter dalgaard
On Apr 9, 2012, at 16:55 , Uwe Ligges wrote: > > > On 08.04.2012 20:39, Bazman76 wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> Can someone explain what the difference between spec.pgram and spec.ar is? >> >> I understand that they attempt to do the same thing one using an AR >> estimation of the underlying serie

Re: [R] Difference between spec.pgram & spec.ar

2012-04-09 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 09.04.2012 17:01, Bazman76 wrote: OK so I neeed to understan better what it it they are trying to measure. I understood (incorrectly it seems) that they were simply different methods to get the same result? Yes. Also note this is a mailing list and you are lucky I was able to remember th

Re: [R] Difference between spec.pgram & spec.ar

2012-04-09 Thread Bazman76
OK so I neeed to understan better what it it they are trying to measure. I understood (incorrectly it seems) that they were simply different methods to get the same result? -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Difference-between-spec-pgram-spec-ar-tp4541358p4542985.html

Re: [R] Difference between spec.pgram & spec.ar

2012-04-09 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 08.04.2012 20:39, Bazman76 wrote: Hi there, Can someone explain what the difference between spec.pgram and spec.ar is? I understand that they attempt to do the same thing one using an AR estimation of the underlying series to estimate teh sensity the other using the FFT. However when appli

[R] Difference between spec.pgram & spec.ar

2012-04-08 Thread Bazman76
Hi there, Can someone explain what the difference between spec.pgram and spec.ar is? I understand that they attempt to do the same thing one using an AR estimation of the underlying series to estimate teh sensity the other using the FFT. However when applied to teh same data set they seem to be g