I'm grateful for your kind help.
I've clearly got the idea and am relieved.
As for question 1, the value of mgcv.conv$rms is small (less than
1.E-5 while GCV being around 1).
For question 2, as I don't have other reasons to doubt the linearity,
I guess the result is OK.
Sincerely,
Ariyo
2007/1
Actually the answers to you questions may well be linked
On Thursday 04 October 2007 22:11, Ariyo Kanno wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'm trying to fit a pure additive model of the following formula :
> fit <- gam(y~x1+te(x2, x3, bs="cr"))
> ,with the smoothing parameter estimation method "magic"(de
Dear all,
I'm trying to fit a pure additive model of the following formula :
fit <- gam(y~x1+te(x2, x3, bs="cr"))
,with the smoothing parameter estimation method "magic"(default).
Regarding this, I have two questions :
Question 1 :
In some cases the value of "mgcv.conv$fully.converged" becomes
"
3 matches
Mail list logo
