On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Addi Wei wrote:
>
> Hopefully simple question: What is the best way to name, and treat factor
> columns for data that has lots of columns?
>
> This is my column list:
> id pID50 D.1 D.2 D.3 D.4 D.5 , etc. all the way to D.185
>
It would be much better to use a fac
On 2010-07-08 13:14, Addi Wei wrote:
Hopefully simple question: What is the best way to name, and treat factor
columns for data that has lots of columns?
This is my column list:
id pID50 D.1 D.2 D.3 D.4 D.5 , etc. all the way to D.185
I was under the impression from several R examples in pls
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Addi Wei wrote:
>
> Hopefully simple question: What is the best way to name, and treat factor
> columns for data that has lots of columns?
>
> This is my column list:
> id pID50 D.1 D.2 D.3 D.4 D.5 , etc. all the way to D.185
>
> I was under the impression from se
On Jul 8, 2010, at 3:14 PM, Addi Wei wrote:
Hopefully simple question: What is the best way to name, and treat
factor
columns for data that has lots of columns?
This is my column list:
id pID50 D.1 D.2 D.3 D.4 D.5 , etc. all the way to D.185
I was under the impression from several R exam
Hopefully simple question: What is the best way to name, and treat factor
columns for data that has lots of columns?
This is my column list:
id pID50 D.1 D.2 D.3 D.4 D.5 , etc. all the way to D.185
I was under the impression from several R examples in pls that if you name
your columns like ab
5 matches
Mail list logo