> On Oct 5, 2014, at 4:51 PM, Lorenzo Isella wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot.
> At this point then I wonder: seen that my response consists of 5
> outcomes for each set of features, should I then train 5 different
> models (one for each of them)?
> Cheers
caret can only model one outcome at a time so
Yes, you should train 5 different models, or find an outcome that can
combine them together, since caret only accepts a list or vector as
outcome.
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Lorenzo Isella
wrote:
> Thanks a lot.
> At this point then I wonder: seen that my response consists of 5
> outcomes f
Thanks a lot.
At this point then I wonder: seen that my response consists of 5
outcomes for each set of features, should I then train 5 different
models (one for each of them)?
Cheers
Lorenzo
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 11:04:01AM -0700, Jia Xu wrote:
Hi, Lorenzo:
For 1) I think the formula is not
Hi, Lorenzo:
For 1) I think the formula is not correct. The formula should be outcome
~ features, and that's why you have weird result in 3)
2) predict in caret will automatically find the best result one if
there is one(sometimes it fails). You can print the model to see the cross
validation
Dear All,
I am learning the ropes of CARET for automatic model training, more or
less following the steps of the tutorial at
http://bit.ly/ZJQINa
However, there are a few things about which I would like a piece of
advice.
Consider for instance the following model
##
5 matches
Mail list logo