Thanks to Gabor Grothendieck, Duncan Murdoch, Hadley Wickham, and
Bert Gunter
for their useful input. I'm beginning to get a glimmering of
understanding,
and I think I now have enough to make some progress.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
#
e-
From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On
Behalf Of Duncan Murdoch
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 2:27 AM
To: hadley wickham
Cc: R-help Forum
Subject: Re: [R] Assigning variables into an environment.
On 09/12/2009 11:29 PM, hadley wickham wrote:
> On We
On 09/12/2009 11:29 PM, hadley wickham wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
I am working with a somewhat complicated structure in which
I need to deal with a function that takes ``basic'' arguments
and also depends on a number of parameters which change depending
on circums
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
>
> I am working with a somewhat complicated structure in which
> I need to deal with a function that takes ``basic'' arguments
> and also depends on a number of parameters which change depending
> on circumstances.
>
> I thought that a sexy way o
R uses lexical scoping, not dynamic scoping. It does not matter where
bar is called from. What matters is where bar was defined and since
bar was defined in the global environment that is where its free
variables are looked up thus environment(bar) is the global
environment. Try changing foo to t
I am working with a somewhat complicated structure in which
I need to deal with a function that takes ``basic'' arguments
and also depends on a number of parameters which change depending
on circumstances.
I thought that a sexy way of dealing with this would be to assign
the parameters as object
6 matches
Mail list logo
