On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 17:21 +0200, Birgit Lemcke wrote:
> Hello Gavin,
>
> thanks for you answer.
> If I use it without " with" I get back the same error.
> The "with" thing was only to try out for functions that do not
> contain a data-argument. I still try to learn and therefor I
> sometimes
Hello Gavin,
thanks for you answer.
If I use it without " with" I get back the same error.
The "with" thing was only to try out for functions that do not
contain a data-argument. I still try to learn and therefor I
sometimes just try.
It is understood that I am on the way to simplify the mode
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 15:43 +0200, Birgit Lemcke wrote:
> Hello R users!
>
> I got again an error message.
Something here is causing compiled code to segfault ("crash"). I don't
know what the problem is here exactly --- I'll let those much more
acquainted with R look into that --- but you seem to
Hello R users!
I got again an error message.
I used this code:
with (FemMal85_Sex, {
ModelFemMal85<-
glm
(Sex~outLatTep_like_other*outLatTep_like_conduplicate*outLatTep_keeled_w
inged*spathellae_co
4 matches
Mail list logo
