Re: [R] [FORGED] Re: [FORGED] Logical Operators' inconsistent Behavior

2017-05-21 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 20/05/2017 10:03 PM, Ramnik Bansal wrote: In the case of logical operations performed with an operand being a character type, the error is: "operations are possible only for numeric, logical or complex types" Now the display of this error message seems to be the OUTCOME of the fact that impli

Re: [R] [FORGED] Re: [FORGED] Logical Operators' inconsistent Behavior

2017-05-20 Thread Ramnik Bansal
In the case of logical operations performed with an operand being a character type, the error is: "operations are possible only for numeric, logical or complex types" Now the display of this error message seems to be the OUTCOME of the fact that implicit coercion is NOT BEING APPLIED INTERNALLY to

Re: [R] [FORGED] Re: [FORGED] Logical Operators' inconsistent Behavior

2017-05-20 Thread Rolf Turner
On 20/05/17 22:42, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 20/05/2017 6:39 AM, Rolf Turner wrote: On 20/05/17 22:18, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 20/05/2017 5:53 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: Ramnik Bansal on Sat, 20 May 2017 08:52:55 +0530 writes: > Taking this question further. > If I use a complex

Re: [R] [FORGED] Re: [FORGED] Logical Operators' inconsistent Behavior

2017-05-20 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 20/05/2017 6:39 AM, Rolf Turner wrote: On 20/05/17 22:18, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 20/05/2017 5:53 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: Ramnik Bansal on Sat, 20 May 2017 08:52:55 +0530 writes: > Taking this question further. > If I use a complex number or a numeric as an operand in logi

Re: [R] [FORGED] Re: [FORGED] Logical Operators' inconsistent Behavior

2017-05-20 Thread Rolf Turner
On 20/05/17 22:18, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 20/05/2017 5:53 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: Ramnik Bansal on Sat, 20 May 2017 08:52:55 +0530 writes: > Taking this question further. > If I use a complex number or a numeric as an operand in logical > operations, to me it APPEARS that