Re: [R] "lag1.plot {astsa}" vs. "lag.plot {stats}"

2015-04-20 Thread Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal
> > By the way, the tsa3 issues page that you reference above...it's > indicates the problems with existing time series functions as the > reason for developing corrected functsion in astsa/tsa3. But the > actual documentation for these corrected functions are extremely > sparse. Is there anoth

Re: [R] "lag1.plot {astsa}" vs. "lag.plot {stats}"

2015-04-20 Thread Paul
Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal noaa.gov> writes: | Not certain which plot you are looking at, but my guess is the | answer is contained somewhere here: | http://www.stat.pitt.edu/stoffer/tsa3/Rissues.htm in particular | perhaps issues 4-5. On Apr 20, 2015, Paul Domaskis gmail.com> wrote: | Yup,

Re: [R] "lag1.plot {astsa}" vs. "lag.plot {stats}"

2015-04-20 Thread Paul
On Apr 17, 2015, at 7:30 PM, Paul Domaskis gmail.com> wrote: > I'm following http://www.stat.pitt.edu/stoffer/tsa3/R_toot.htm to > ramp up on both time series and R. About 40% of the way down, the > tutorial uses lag1.plot from astsa and lag.plot from stats. The > positioning of the dots look di

Re: [R] "lag1.plot {astsa}" vs. "lag.plot {stats}"

2015-04-17 Thread Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal
Not certain which plot you are looking at, but my guess is the answer is contained somewhere here: http://www.stat.pitt.edu/stoffer/tsa3/Rissues.htm in particular perhaps issues 4-5. -Roy M. > On Apr 17, 2015, at 7:30 PM, Paul Domaskis wrote: > > I'm following http://www.stat.pitt.edu/stoffer

[R] "lag1.plot {astsa}" vs. "lag.plot {stats}"

2015-04-17 Thread Paul Domaskis
I'm following http://www.stat.pitt.edu/stoffer/tsa3/R_toot.htm to ramp up on both time series and R. About 40% of the way down, the tutorial uses lag1.plot from astsa and lag.plot from stats. The positioning of the dots look different between the two. Nothing jumps out at me from the help pages