; Anyway, it does not make sense to predict weight using a linear
> combination (principle component) that contains weight, does it?
>
> Uwe Ligges
It's likely to have been homework: A quick search on "masterinex"
"xevilgang79" reveal which university this undergr
this is how my data matrix looks like . This is just for the first 10
observations , but the pattern is similar for the other observations.
112.3 154.25 67.75 36.2 93.1 85.2 94.5 59.0 37.3 21.9 32.0
27.4 17.1
2 6.1 173.25 72.25 38.5 93.6 83.0 98.7 58.7 37.3 23.4 30.
low.com and received the
> same answer. This is rude because it duplicates effort. If you
> urgently need a response to a question, perhaps you should consider
> paying for it.
>
> Hadley
>
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:04 PM, masterinex
> wrote:
>>
>> so unde
so under which cases is it better to standardize the data matrix first ?
also is PCA generally used to predict the response variable , should I
keep that variable in my data matrix ?
Uwe Ligges-3 wrote:
>
> masterinex wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi guys ,
>>
>>
Hi guys ,
Im trying to do principal component analysis in R . There is 2 ways of doing
it , I believe.
One is doing principal component analysis right away the other way is
standardizing the matrix first using s = scale(m)and then apply principal
component analysis.
How do I tell what
5 matches
Mail list logo