Re: [R] lm(y ~ x1) vs. lm(y ~ x0 + x1 - 1) with x0 <- rep(1, length(y))

ote: >> >> On Jan 21, 2011, at 9:03 PM, jochen laubrock wrote: >> >>> Dear list, >>> >>> the following came up in an introductory class. Please help me understand >>> the -1 (or 0+) syntax in formulae: Why do the enumerator dfs, F-statisics

[R] lm(y ~ x1) vs. lm(y ~ x0 + x1 - 1) with x0 <- rep(1, length(y))

: 2.338e-10 Thanks in advance, Jochen Jochen Laubrock, Dept. of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Strasse 24-25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany phone: +49-331-977-2346, fax: +49-331-977-2793 __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.