Sorry if it is a silly question, I haven't found documentation on this and I
don't know if it is possible.
library(MASS) ## for fitdistr
library(msm) ## for dtnorm
#prepare truncated normal distribution
dtnorm0 <- function(x, mean, sd , log = FALSE) {
dtnorm(x, mean, sd, 105, 135, log)
}
s
function? Are these means more appropiate to use in a glm?
Thanks in advance
David
Ruben Roa Ureta wrote:
>
> drbn wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I have seen that some papers do this:
>>
>> 1.) Group data by year (e.g. 35 years)
>>
>> 2.) Estimate the mean
Hello,
I have seen that some papers do this:
1.) Group data by year (e.g. 35 years)
2.) Estimate the mean of the key variable through the distribution that fits
better (some years is a normal distribution , others is a more skewed, gamma
distribution, etc.)
3.) With these estimated means of ea
Frain wrote:
>
> This idea is very wrong, Have a look at the function cnormal1 in the
> VGAM package
>
> John frain
>
> 2008/10/15 drbn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> I'm using stableFit from the package fBasics to estimate the parameters
>> of a
>&
I'm using stableFit from the package fBasics to estimate the parameters of a
truncated normal distribution (I'm interested in the parameters of the
underlying normal distribution). It is correct to generalize this truncated
normal distribution as a stable distribution ?
Thanks
David
--
View thi
5 matches
Mail list logo