tario, Canada
N2L 3G1
T:(1)-519-888-4567 x 33895
F:(1)-519-746-0614
dde...@scimail.uwaterloo.ca
http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~ddepew
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting gu
--
David Depew
PhD Candidate
Department of Biology
University of Waterloo
200 University Ave W
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
N2L 3G1
T:(1)-519-888-4567 x 33895
F:(1)-519-746-0614
dde...@scimail.uwaterloo.ca
http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~ddepew
Quoting Sarah Goslee :
Hi David,
On Fri, May 8,
rloo, Ontario, Canada
N2L 3G1
T:(1)-519-888-4567 x 33895
F:(1)-519-746-0614
dde...@scimail.uwaterloo.ca
http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~ddepew
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the postin
Hi all,
I'm a little stumped on this.
I have 5 data frames with continuous GPS coordinates at 5 to 10 m
spacing. Due to the different GPS units used, data collected within
one to two sec apart have coordinates that differ by 3 to 5 m on
average. I'd like to aggrate the data frames relative t
Oddly enough, the variogram modelling is rather quick in Surfer, but
one cannot compute the standard errors. I restricted the search to the
approximate the range of the variogram model (2000m). I can get R to
compute with 12079 observations, but 13453 and I run into the gstat
error message.
5 matches
Mail list logo