Re: [R] Oddity: I seem to have a variable in a dataframe that doesn't show in colnames() - can anyone advise?

I thought it might have been that but stupidly didn't search on "$" and I can now see that the one partial match I tried would have been ambiguous so "$" hadn't resolved it. Patrick Burns tells me I could have found this in the wonderful "R inferno" and I'm sure I could have, probably have, read t

Re: [R] What is the best way to have "R" output tables in an MS Word format? (shaping R core)

I've changed the subject line a bit here as Max is asking such a fundamental question. Max Kuhn sent the following at 01/05/2010 19:22: > Chris, > ... > Why is it R Core's job to fulfill your wants and desires? I have a > hard time thinking that very busy people would spend extra time doing > s

Re: [R] What is the best way to have "R" output tables in an MS Word format?

Tal Galili sent the following at 06/05/2010 17:33: > Hi Chris, > > Following this thread, I started experimenting with the R2wd package myself. > > I wrote to the developer who gave me some promising news (that is - that > an updated package is expected to be released in the next couple of month

Re: [R] formatted output facilities ... was ..Oddity with internet access and R 11.0 - solved

David Winsemius sent the following at 24/04/2010 18:24: >> Now that I'm here, courtesy of my time slip, what I'd really love to see >> in R 10.0.0, or even 2.12.0, is the choice to have output either in the >> current plain text or to some simple formatting primitives that would >> have default ta

Re: [R] Oddity with internet access and R 11.0 with Sophos firewall and Windoze XP - solved (and version numbers corrected!)

Ah, Dr. Who's got nothing on me! Beg pardon, I'm recuperating from an operation and clearly more than usually disoriented. I meant 2.10.1 and 2.11.0 of course. Now that I'm here, courtesy of my time slip, what I'd really love to see in R 10.0.0, or even 2.12.0, is the choice to have output eithe