Re: [R] Replace values on seq

> I will report results then, OK, its better this way, but no so much. Before: 99.79 (a) vs 0.21 (b) Now: 99.77 (a) vs 0.23 (b) But these results continue to be surprising for me. Ok. Thanks you guys again, I will continue bothering you sometime. Walter ___

Re: [R] Replace values on seq

> Does this help clarify the differences? For sure! Thanks Jim. I will test with the solutions you gave me, maybe the differences are not so big, I was just surprised about that. I will report results then, Thanks! Walter __ R-help@r-project.org mail

Re: [R] Replace values on seq

> code (C in this case). What exactly are you asking? You can alway > 'time' (sys.time) a set of statements to see which is better (just > make sure you execute them enough times to get reasonable readings -- > several seconds) I was wondering where to seach for the code of these different optio

Re: [R] Replace values on seq

> Hope this is helpful, Certainly! Thanks Dan and Jim! Now, I wonder where I can dig in to realize why this is better. Is C code for this function better than others? Is C guilty on this? Maybe I am too newbie. Thanks again, guys! Walter __ R-help@r

[R] Replace values on seq

Hey guys, sorry for the inconvenience (this might be a hundred times answered question), but I have been searching a while and gave up about the following: I have the following, table and data: table <- seq(255, 0, by=-1) data <- c(1,8,...) <--- doesn't matter what's in here Which would be th