Re: [R] Ways to get all function signatures of a library?

Gabor Grothendieck writes: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Thorsten Jolitz wrote: >> >> Hi List, >> >> are there ways to get signatures of all functions of a library in a >> format that is easy to process by a programm (list, xml or so)? >> >> T

Re: [R] Ways to get all function signatures of a library?

nts. > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 6:09 AM, Thorsten Jolitz wrote: >> >> Hi List, >> >> are there ways to get signatures of all functions of a library in a >> format that is easy to process by a programm (list, xml or so)? >> >> The info about function name,

[R] Ways to get all function signatures of a library?

Hi List, are there ways to get signatures of all functions of a library in a format that is easy to process by a programm (list, xml or so)? The info about function name, return value and arguments (types) is all there in the docs, but more in a human readable format embedded in much extra info

Re: [R] Skipping .Rd files and using Org-mode instead?

Rolf Turner writes: > On 01/06/14 03:52, Thorsten Jolitz wrote: >> >> Hi List, >> >> it seems that .Rd files are just an intermediary format used for >> exporting to txt, html and latex when creating an R package. >> >> How flexible is the R pac

[R] Skipping .Rd files and using Org-mode instead?

Hi List, it seems that .Rd files are just an intermediary format used for exporting to txt, html and latex when creating an R package. How flexible is the R package mechanism? Would it possible to skip .Rd files alltogether, write the docs with another tool (e.g. Emacs Org-mode), export them t

Re: [R] Big, complex, well-structured .R file for demonstration?

t than to deal with many small files. But otherwise I agree with you, its much better to split a file up before it becomes a growing mess. > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Thorsten Jolitz wrote: > >> >> Hi List, >> >> I'm looking for a rather big, but well struct

Re: [R] Big, complex, well-structured .R file for demonstration?

Sarah Goslee writes: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Thorsten Jolitz wrote: >> >> Hi List, >> >> I'm looking for a rather big, but well structured R file that contains >> as much of R language features as possible (i.e. that uses a lot of the >>

[R] Big, complex, well-structured .R file for demonstration?

Hi List, I'm looking for a rather big, but well structured R file that contains as much of R language features as possible (i.e. that uses a lot of the functionality described in the 'R Reference Card' and, if possible, S4 classes too). I want to check some code I wrote against such a file and

Re: [R] Using R as Shared Library

Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: > On 12 August 2012 at 07:56, Michael Weylandt wrote: > | On Aug 12, 2012, at 6:09 AM, Thorsten Jolitz > | wrote: > | > Thorsten Jolitz writes: > | > Let me reformulate my question (since I managed to make 'native' calls > | > to

Re: [R] Using R as Shared Library

Thorsten Jolitz writes: Let me reformulate my question (since I managed to make 'native' calls to C functions in libR by now): I still wonder whats 'in there' in libR - only the core C functions, or all the functions written in R itself too? And what packages are included?

[R] Using R as Shared Library

Hi List, I find the following .so file in the R folder of my Arch Linux machine: ,-- | usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so `-- I copied it to my home folder and changed permissons from root to my personal user and then tried to call R functions from a different languag