ect;", "invokeMethod", cl, :
org.apache.poi.POIXMLException: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
I'm not sure if my java has been updated recently, my current version is:
java version "1.6.0_24"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.11.3) (6b24-1.11.3-1ubuntu0.11.04.1)
OpenJDK Server V
I think you can use the cumsum function. If you think of your falses
to 1 and your trues to 0 then you're just sequentially adding the
numbers in the vector.
x = c(FALSE, FALSE, TRUE, FALSE, TRUE, TRUE, FALSE, FALSE)
y = rep(1,length(x))*(1-x)
cumsum(y)
Hope that helps,
Sam
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011
And I figured it out, sorry to bother the list.
The normal approximation I was using is not accurate in the presence of ties.
Sam
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Sam Stewart wrote:
> So I checked it with the wilcox_test in the coin library, and got the
> same result. That makes m
th(remain
wilcox_test(value~group,data=d)
Sam
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Sam Stewart wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I'm trying to prepare some lecture notes on non parametric methods,
> and I can't manually reproduce the results of the wilcox.test function
> for o
p page that there is some controversy about how
exactly to calculate the test statistic, but that's not what is
causing the problem, as I can get the same W value. Am I calculating
the test statistic incorrectly?
Thanks, sample code below
Sam Stewart
#Ordinal example
dropouts = c(rep(0,25),re
I think the following pdf will explain the details of how to use the
optim function.
http://www.unc.edu/~monogan/computing/r/MLE_in_R.pdf
Hope that helps,
Sam
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Thiem Alrik wrote:
> Dear mailing list,
>
> I would like to use the optim() command in order to maximiz
Wow, that's really clever, I didn't know you could manipulate the
palette like that.
Thanks Dr Ripley,
Sam
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Prof Brian Ripley
wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, R Help wrote:
>>
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to pl
thinkIMP, e80, NA
takeriskFthinkbrave<->takeriskFthinkbrave, e81, NA
takeriskFthinkexciting<->takeriskFthinkexciting, e82, NA
reSELF<->reSELF, e83, NA
reNORISK<->reNORISK, e84, NA
reNOPERSON<->reNOPERSON, e85, NA
reNOCONSE<->reNOCONSE, e86, NA
reWRONG<->reWR
lidation is set to 10-fold.
I guess I just need conformation that cross-validation doesn't work with
custom functions, and if someone could explain to me why that is the case it
would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Sam Stewart
--
Sam Stewart, MMath
Research Statistician, Diagnostic Imag
9 matches
Mail list logo