Re: [R] gamlss results for EXP and LNO seem to have reversed AIC scores

Thank you. I was obviously mis-interpreting the AIC results. RdR -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/gamlss-results-for-EXP-and-LNO-seem-to-have-reversed-AIC-scores-tp4413702p4415275.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com

[R] gamlss results for EXP and LNO seem to have reversed AIC scores

d light on why these results would occur? cheers, RdR -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/gamlss-results-for-EXP-and-LNO-seem-to-have-reversed-AIC-scores-tp4409754p4409754.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __

[R] low sigma in lognormal fit of gamlss

in the ballpark, but sigma is very low. I get similar results on repeated trials and with Normal and standard normal distributions. How should I understand sigma in these results? cheers, RdR # Example # # enable reproduction set.seed(1234) # create some lognormal data X

Re: [R] low sigma in lognormal fit of gamlss

Actually, I think I've spotted it: the link function for sigma is "log" and exp(0.69) is nearly 2 -- the original sigma -RdR -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/low-sigma-in-lognormal-fit-of-gamlss-tp3962480p3962487.html Sent from the R help mailing