anyone?
RFTW wrote:
>
> ok... the model now runs properly (say, without errors). Now about the
> result.
> These are the averages per treatments
>
> tapply(VecesArbolCo.VecesCo.C1,T2,mean)
> a b c d
> 0.49 0.56 0.45 0.58
>
>
> I run thi
ok... the model now runs properly (say, without errors). Now about the
result.
These are the averages per treatments
tapply(VecesArbolCo.VecesCo.C1,T2,mean)
a b c d
0.49 0.56 0.45 0.58
I run this very simple model
> summary(model1<-lmer(cbind(VisitsExpTree,TotalVisits-VisitsEx
tes of all treatments and 2) which treatments are different from
which.
Luc.
PS. the names are not the original names in the file
Ben Bolker wrote:
>
> RFTW nioo.knaw.nl> writes:
>
>
>> Our question is if the proportion of visits to the experimental tree, in
>> r
Hi,
We released individual birds into a room with 2 trees. We counted the number
of visits to each of the 2 tree. One of the trees is always a control tree
and the other tree is either treatment 1, treatment 2 or treatment3 or
treatment 4.
Ind Treat ContrTree ExpTree Total visits
1
4 matches
Mail list logo