Dear Friends,
I have the very simple problem of needing to number observations in a data
frame. After scratching the rest of my hair off my head without inspiration,
I'm using a silly loop. I'm sure that there is a much more elegant and
faster solution - can anyone help?
Here is an example:
my.
Dear Friends,
I'm contributing to a paper on a new R package for a clinical (medicine,
ophthalmology) audience, and part of the mission is to encourage people who
might be occasional users of Excel or SPSS, to become more familiar with R.
I'd really appreciate any pointers to more recent papers th
DeaR all,
The stripchart function (graphics) is provides jittered and stacked
univariate scatterplots, but I wonder if anyone has implemented a
*symmetric* version of this - as in the lower panel of Wilkinson's paper:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2686111
I have looked through several functions i
his clear -
mea culpa). A clearer heading might have attracted more readers. In my
(personal) view none of the other lists you mention really compare to this
one (R-help), but allstat might be added also.
David Winsemius wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 19, 2009, at 6:36 AM, Paul Artes wrote:
&
Publication of "Exploratory Data Analysis" by John Tukey. Strange Tukey's
name has not been mentioned so far. You should consider re-posting your most
interesting question with a less apologetic title - perhaps you will get a
larger range of replies.
Best wishes
Paul
losemind wrote:
>
> Thank
I would like to estimate the difference between two measurement techniques.
With both techniques, 4 measurements were obtained in each of 15
individuals. (These are not *repeated* measurements though - each of the 4
is of a different attribute). The naive approach would be a paired t-test,
but of
There is a nice paper by Yssaad-Fesselier and Knoblauch on "Modelling
Psychometric Functions in R".
http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/13/17/99/PDF/B125.pdf
You might also be interested in this:
http://www.journalofvision.org/5/5/8/article.aspx
which comes from the same group as the psignifi
DeaRs,
i'm looking for some references on a statement as follows:
"Humans are good at spotting trends and patterns in data, but they are also
good at spotting those patterns where none really exist". This is not
verbatim but there must be some scholarly work on this. I can't remember
where I came
ne it empirically? (over and
above
some thinking about how censoring might be related to baseline factors).
Would very much appreciate your thoughts and any pointers you can give
Best wishes
Paul aRtes
=
Paul H Artes, PhD
Associate Professor & F
9 matches
Mail list logo