Points taken and terms(formula) is used now. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: William Dunlap [mailto:wdun...@tibco.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 11:56 AM
To: Pang Du; r-help@r-project.org
Subject: RE: [R] question on formula and terms.formula()
I think you should replace
"terms.formula(mf$formula)".
Pang Du
Virginia Tech
-Original Message-
From: William Dunlap [mailto:wdun...@tibco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 12:21 PM
To: pan...@vt.edu; r-help@r-project.org
Subject: RE: [R] question on formula and terms.formula()
Does your code work if yo
ntially sets C at a value such that the contribution from C is 0.
Unfortunately, this option is not available in survreg for some reason.
Pang
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Robinson [mailto:a.robin...@ms.unimelb.edu.au]
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 7:55 PM
To: Pang Du
Cc: r-help@r-p
.au]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 10:13 PM
To: Pang Du
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] two-way group mean prediction in survreg with three factors
I hope not!
Facetiousness aside, the model that you have fit contains C, and,
indeed, an interaction between A and C. So, the effect of A upon th
o-way group mean estimates, say
estimated group mean for (A1, B1)-group? The sample group means don't
incorporate censoring and thus may not be appropriate here.
Pang Du
Virginia Tech
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-help@r-p
5 matches
Mail list logo