Okay, you've all successfully convinced me to leave this list. Bye!
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
>
> On 02/05/18 09:53, Michelle Kline wrote:
>
> Hi Bert,
>>
>> That was distinctly unhelpful
>>
>
> Not if you actually follow Bert
void producing yet more irreproducible
> psychological research.
>
> Cheers,
> Bert
> Bert Gunter
>
> "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along
> and sticking things into it."
> -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom Cou
Hi all,
I previously emailed about a multinomial model, and after seeking some
additional help, realized that since my response/outcome variables are not
mutually exclusive, I need to use a multi-response model that is *not*
multinomial. I'm now trying to figure out how to specify the priors on th
er my University's ethics approval would allow me to
post the data and update the question if I think it is allowable.
Michelle
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 10:13 AM David Winsemius
wrote:
>
> > On Mar 22, 2018, at 1:31 PM, Michelle Kline <
> michelle.ann.kl...@gmail.com> wrote:
&
Hi,
Thanks in advance for any help on this question. I'm running multinomial
models using the MCMCglmm package. The models have 5 outcome variables
(each with count data), and an additional two random effects built into the
models. The issue is that when I use the following code, the summary only
5 matches
Mail list logo