Re: [R] [FORGED] Re: Specifying priors in a multi-response MCMCglmm

2018-05-01 Thread Michelle Kline
Okay, you've all successfully convinced me to leave this list. Bye! On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Rolf Turner wrote: > > On 02/05/18 09:53, Michelle Kline wrote: > > Hi Bert, >> >> That was distinctly unhelpful >> > > Not if you actually follow Bert&#x

Re: [R] Specifying priors in a multi-response MCMCglmm

2018-05-01 Thread Michelle Kline
void producing yet more irreproducible > psychological research. > > Cheers, > Bert > Bert Gunter > > "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along > and sticking things into it." > -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom Cou

[R] Specifying priors in a multi-response MCMCglmm

2018-05-01 Thread Michelle Kline
Hi all, I previously emailed about a multinomial model, and after seeking some additional help, realized that since my response/outcome variables are not mutually exclusive, I need to use a multi-response model that is *not* multinomial. I'm now trying to figure out how to specify the priors on th

Re: [R] MCMCglmm multinomial model results

2018-03-24 Thread Michelle Kline
er my University's ethics approval would allow me to post the data and update the question if I think it is allowable. Michelle On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 10:13 AM David Winsemius wrote: > > > On Mar 22, 2018, at 1:31 PM, Michelle Kline < > michelle.ann.kl...@gmail.com> wrote: &

[R] MCMCglmm multinomial model results

2018-03-22 Thread Michelle Kline
Hi, Thanks in advance for any help on this question. I'm running multinomial models using the MCMCglmm package. The models have 5 outcome variables (each with count data), and an additional two random effects built into the models. The issue is that when I use the following code, the summary only