Thank you very much, Ben. Your answer has been very useful.
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and
I suspect that your "treatment" levels are perfectly nested inside the
"soilgroup" levels. If this were the case you can either use one of the
factor in your analysis or the other, depending on what you want to
analyze.
Il giorno Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:47:18 +
Mir Salam ha scritto:
> Dear all,
DeaR userRs,
I recently read this Liang-Zeger article:
http://sankhya.isical.ac.in/search/62b1/fpaper7.html
in which (among other things) they adopt a random intercept model for
pre-post designed trials, using a conditional likelihood approach
(I didn't think it possible with only two measuremen
Hi, Lars.
I don't understand well your question. why don't you simply type
pred_leuk
Call: survfit(formula = leuk.cox, newdata = leuk_new)
records n.max n.start events median 0.95LCL 0.95UCL
1 4242 42 30 1 1 23
2 4242 42 30 7
Hi all,
and thank you for your interested answers. The problem could be
already solved. It is present on my old R 2.15.1
(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), but after reproducing the error I got the
expected result on a R 3.0.2 through a web interface. However, since I
spent a considerable amount of time to un
deaR user,
I found an unexpected behaviour of the rms::survplot.survfit function, that
is giving me inverted labels for the patient-at-risk rows. The problem is
that, for some reason, the survival::summary.survfit function changes the
order of two of the suvfit object's strata when called (on my d
me to bother
at all.
I'm not asking for prepackaged solutions, rather for help in
documentation seeking and links to useful documentation or other
threads (for example: is it worthwhile using parallel computing?)
Thank you to anyone for reading this email.
Marco Barbàra.
P.S.: I work on a Debia
Hi all,
sometime in the past I accidentaly created a copy of the c()
primitive function inside my ``laboratory'' workspace, which I
normally use to experiment and learn. As a consequence, c() stopped to
work correctly and started to return lists of symbols instead of
vectors, and today I had to sp
Il giorno Mon, 2 May 2011 07:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
Frank Harrell ha scritto:
> Please elaborate.
It is simply that, generally speaking, i don't like adding numbers to a
plot. I eventually realized that riskset cardinality may be a useful
indication. However, do not discriminate between events and ce
Thank you very much.
Despite prof. Harrell's support (for whom I feel great
esteem) I still remain doubtful about this feature.
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://w
DeaR experts,
I was asked for a log-rank pairwise survival comparison. I've a straightforward
way
to do this using the SAS system:
http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63033/HTML/default/viewer.htm#/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63033/HTML/default/statug_lifetest_sect019.htm
What
t this is generally
not recommended, isn't it?
Any sort of comment will be appreciated.
Thank you very much.
Marco Barbàra.
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide
eed time interaction...
>
> The cox.zph function is primarily graphical; I would respond to your
> question with "is it good to look at scatterplots before fitting a
> linear model?" My answer to this is emphatically yes.
>
> Terry Therneau
>
>
Thank y
this is self-reply only to insert my real name
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained,
Il giorno Wed, 19 May 2010 08:46:06 -0700 (PDT)
Javier ha scritto:
>
> Dear users,
>
> Is there anyone how knows how to plot the sample size on top of the
> bars of a barchart plot?
Do you mean something like this?
mp <- barplot( VADeaths[1,], ylim = c( 0 , 18 ) )
text( mp , VADeaths[1,] + 0
>
> Is this result reliable?
No. chisq.test is a non parametric goodness-of-fit test for
*counts*. In my opinion you need a one sample t.test.
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting
to look inside this file to search for
differences with working ones, but from within R I cannot save an ascii
version of this file due to this problem, and i do not know what kind
of compression was applied (gunzip says «not in gzip format»).
Is there a way of inspecting this file?
thank you
CTYPE=it_IT;LC_NUMERIC=C;LC_TIME=it_IT;LC_COLLATE=it_IT;LC_MONETARY=C;LC_MESSAGES=it_IT;LC_PAPER=it_IT;LC_NAME=C;LC_ADDRESS=C;LC_TELEPHONE=C;LC_MEASUREMENT=it_IT;LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
attached base packages:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods
base
other attached packages:
[
18 matches
Mail list logo