of the help,
Magnus
On 11/4/2013 8:20 PM, Thomas Lumley wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Martin Morgan mailto:mtmor...@fhcrc.org>> wrote:
On 11/01/2013 08:22 AM, Magnus Thor Torfason wrote:
Sure,
I was attempting to be concise and boiling it down to what
lto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On
Behalf
Of Magnus Thor Torfason
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 8:23 AM
To: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] Inserting 17M entries into env took 18h, inserting 34M entries
taking 5+
days
Sure,
I was attempting to be concise and boiling it down to what I saw as
: Tell me what you want to do, not how you
want to do it. There may be other solutions to your problem.
Jim Holtman
Data Munger Guru
What is the problem that you are trying to solve?
Tell me what you want to do, not how you want to do it.
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Magnus Thor
There are around 16M unique values. After accounting for equivalence,
the number is much smaller (I don't know how much smaller, since my
program has not completed yet :-)
Yes, I meant that "B and C are also equivalent". The original version
was a typo.
Best,
Magnus
On 11/1/2013 3:45 PM, ji
problem that you are trying to solve?
Tell me what you want to do, not how you want to do it.
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Magnus Thor Torfason
wrote:
Pretty much what the subject says:
I used an env as the basis for a Hashtable in R, based on information that
this is in fact the way envir
Pretty much what the subject says:
I used an env as the basis for a Hashtable in R, based on information
that this is in fact the way environments are implemented under the hood.
I've been experimenting with doubling the number of entries, and so far
it has seemed to be scaling more or less l
Thanks for putting together such a quick fix! Unfortunately the policy
for the system that I'm working on doesn't allow unreleased versions, so
I'll have to work around this for a little bit longer. But I'll ask my
sysadmins to install 3.0.3 as soon as it gets released.
Best,
Magnus
On 9/27/2
Just ran these two statements:
> min(NA,"bla")
[1] NA
> min("bla", NA)
[1] "bla"
And then reran with explicit na.rm=FALSE
> min(NA,"bla", na.rm=FALSE)
[1] NA
> min("bla", NA, na.rm=FALSE)
[1] "bla"
That seems wrong. Would this be considered a bug or is there a way to
explain these results
Hi all,
I ran into a small issue when converting a list of vectors to a data
frame. The Issue I'm having is described by the snippet below:
#
# Convert a list of vectors into a data.frame
strlen = 256
s.long.a = paste( letters[1+(0:strle
9 matches
Mail list logo
