tsonkernel()
But these are not the same as ksmooth() $B!D(B but still ksmooth() seems to
result in better fit so I would like
To know what it does to achieve this better fit?
Best regards
Jesper Hybel Pedersen
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
451762
#>[2,] -6.3785096 6.3785096
#>The system is stable.
#>[1] TRUE
#>attr(,"roots")
#> Inverse of distinct roots of det(A(L))moduli
#>[1,] 0.9567764 0.9567764
#>[2,] -0.1567764 0.1567764
Hi Jean,
Thanks for the reply..
Using your suggestion, I end up in in the source code (Fortran 77 i
believe). At first look, it seems a bit more tedious to implement than I
expected.
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Application-of-results-from-smooth-spline-outsid
. I
have looked at literature, but i cannot connect the output of the
smooth.spline() to an actual spline model..
Has anyone tried it?
Br
Jesper
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Application-of-results-from-smooth-spline-outside-R-tp3767610p3767610.html
Sent from th
calcualted values. if anyone could help me or give me some tips i would
deeply appriciate it
thanks
jesper
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the
5 matches
Mail list logo