I'm not sure how returning an incorrect result is ever a 'positive' feature but
at least the documentation could more clearly warn users that this method
behaves differently in these cases -- summary(rock[,1]) vs summary(rock[,1:2])
-- and that the method can and does return incorrect results wi
The summary function behaves inconsistently with data frame columns, e.g.
summary(rock) #max of area 12212, correct
summary(rock$area) #max of area 12210, incorrect max
I know that
summary(rock$area, digits=5)
will correct the error (I DID read the manual). But my point is the
inc
2 matches
Mail list logo
