Thank you!
Best Regards
Henrik
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Maximum-Likelihood-Estimation-in-R-tp2018822p2022832.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
h
Abhishek:
Thank you!
Thomas:
that worked out well, thank you again!
I also tried to use lm, and as expected in this case, I almost got the same
estimates of the parameters as in the MLE-case.
Best Regards
Henrik
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Maximum-L
that worked out well, thank you again!
I also tried to use lm, and as expected in this case, I almost got the same
estimates of the parameters as in the MLE-case.
Best Regards
Henrik
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Maximum-Likelihood-Estimation-in-R-tp201882
Thank you Thomas.
(a) an embarrassing mistake by me. Of course it should be squared. Thank you
for pointing that out.
(b) Do you possibly have any suggestions on how to solve this issue? I
presume that there is no reason in trying to create a lagged "vector"
manually?
Best Regards
Henrik
--
Dear R-Help,
my name is Henrik and I am currently trying to solve a Maximum Likelihood
optimization problem in R. Below you can find the output from R, when I use
the "BFGS" method:
The problem is that the parameters that I get are very unreasonable, I would
expect the absolute value of each p
Dear R-Help,
I also send the following post by e-mail to you, however I try to post it
here aswell. My name is Henrik and I am currently trying to solve a Maximum
Likelihood optimization problem in R. Below you can find the output from R,
when I use the "BFGS" method:
The problem is that the p
6 matches
Mail list logo