Re: [R] Djjlölkjhfyn kb noknkkkkokljjyikkk hyjjjjjkjjjjkjkkpooololåååååååååååååååääääkkuiivjkoööklopipållällnbbbn mml ömmmm

> On Nov 11, 2012 9:10 AM, "peter dalgaard" <mailto:pda...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > > On Nov 11, 2012, at 16:57 , Gustaf Granath wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > M > > > Påopklpnlbyjönvnmm > > > M. Öplppkbk

[R] Djjlölkjhfyn kb noknkkkkokljjyikkk hyjjjjjkjjjjkjkkpooololåååååååååååååååääääkkuiivjkoööklopipållällnbbbn mml ömmmm

M Påopklpnlbyjönvnmm M. Öplppkbkvöökä knbnnåöllpööåååtx hikkkhgxxx vj julöl Sent from my iPhonejukujöbömjl jnmnmmm Sorry for keeping things short Gustaf Granath (phd) Plant Ecology Uppsala University __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list

Re: [R] mgcv pack- gam() - question about the by argument

th relatively few data. You could set up a factor variable for the site:time interaction (i.e. one level for each combination of site and time) but that would be pushing it a bit for this number of data. Simon On Wednesday 22 October 2008 13:05, Gustaf Granath wrote: R fellows, I

[R] mgcv pack- gam() - question about the by argument

odel without site mod.no.site<-gam(y~s(x),data=mydata) #Model including the factor Site. id=1 to get the same smothing parameter at each factor level. mod.with.site<-gam(y~Site+s(x,by=Site,id=1),data=mydata) #AIC for the two models AIC(mod.no.site,mod.with.site) Thanks, Gust

Re: [R] Weird SEs with effect()

udging by your answers. Thanks again for your help, Gustaf John Fox wrote: > Dear Gustaf, > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Gustaf Granath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: February-17-08 4:18 PM >> To: John Fox >> Cc: 'Prof Brian Ripley'

Re: [R] Weird SEs with effect()

sity > Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4M4 > 905-525-9140x23604 > http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/jfox > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: February-17-08 6:42 AM >> To: Gustaf Granath >> Cc: John Fox;

Re: [R] Weird SEs with effect()

er.ca/jfox > > >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> project.org] On Behalf Of Gustaf Granath >> Sent: February-16-08 11:43 AM >> To: r-help@r-project.org >> Subject: [R] Weird SEs with effect() >> >> H

[R] Weird SEs with effect()

e exp(). To be honest, I get the feeling that Im on the wrong track here. Basically, I want to know how SE is calculated in effect() (all I know is that the reported standard errors are for the fitted values) and if anyone knows what is going on here.

[R] How to get two y-axises in a bar plot?

but I guess that should not be a problem. For code and data, see below. Cheers, Gustaf Granath, phd student My code so far: #Creating data c(6.34,13.38,17.87)->y1 c(0.85,1.88,2.33)->y2 c(0,1.5,3)->x cbind(y1,y2,x)->mydata data.frame(mydata)->mydata with(mydata, tapply(y1,x,mean)

[R] Interpretation of 'Intercept' in a 2-way factorial lm

t A1 and B1 combined as one mean ("the baseline")? or is it something else? Does this number actually tell me anything useful (2.716)?? What does the model (y = intercept + ??) look like then? I can't understand how both factors (A and B) can have the same intercept? Thanks in ad

[R] Strange results with anova.glm()

table would give me a quite similar result because I only have two levels (of the infl.treat factor) and no interactions in the model. ## I'm afraid I have missed something trivial though so please, be gentle ;) Cheers, Gustaf Granath -- Gustaf Granath (PhD student) Dept of Plant Ecology