So are you saying that one way to estimate goodness of fit would be to run
each of models using glm() and compare their BIC scores?
Is there a recommended way to demonstrate improvements in goodness of fit
when using svyglm?
Thanks
Brad
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabb
Does anyone know how to calculated a BIC score (or an equivalent model
fitness score) when using svyglm for logistic regressions?
Thanks
Brad
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Generating-a-model-fitness-when-score-using-svyglm-tp2069280p2069280.html
Sent from the R
Does the survey package have a function similar to prop.test() Or is there a
way to use svyciprop() to perform a Chi-square test to see if the difference
in proportions is significant?
I'm comparing liberal congregations with conservative congregations in their
sponsorship of HIV/AIDS programs.
I'm using the describe function in (Hmisc) with survey data.
When I run this command: describe(NCS,weights=NCS$w1)
I get this error message:
Error in describe(NCS, weights = NCS$w1) :
unused argument(s) (weights = c(2.49460916442049,...
Do you know why it is not using the weights argument?
I’m running some logistic regressions and I’ve been trying to include weights
in the equation. However, when I run the model, I get this warning message:
Here’s what it says: Warning message: In eval(expr, envir, enclos) :
non-integer #successes in a binomial glm!
I think it is because the w
5 matches
Mail list logo