that makes sense, thanks for the reply
On 13 June 2012 05:53, Uwe Ligges wrote:
>
>
> On 11.06.2012 11:45, Ceci Tam wrote:
>
>> diag(n) is alright when n = 5e3, it took 0.7 sec on my machine for
>> diag(5e3). However, it's slow when n = 23000, diag(23000) took 15 s
diag(n) is alright when n = 5e3, it took 0.7 sec on my machine for
diag(5e3). However, it's slow when n = 23000, diag(23000) took 15 sec
On 11 June 2012 17:43, Ceci Tam wrote:
> diag(n) is alright when n = 5e3, it took 0.7 sec on my machine for
> diag(5e3). However, it's slo
Hello, I am trying to build a large size identity matrix using diag(). The
size is around 23000 and I've tried diag(23000), that took a long time.
Since I have to use this operation several times in my program, the running
time is too long to be tolerable. Are there any alternative for diag(N)?
Tha
3 matches
Mail list logo