Hi Abby,
I don’t really understand why you’re upset with me, but a) they’re cultured
cell lines, not animals, b) they might cure people, c) I don’t do experiments,
d) modern slavery, dated today:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/sep/21/such-brutality-tricked-into-slavery-in-the-thai-fishi
Hah, fair. I do hope somebody does see it and gives it a thought.
Thanks,
Ben
On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 at 01:29, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal <
roy.mendelss...@noaa.gov> wrote:
> Please All:
>
> While as I said in my first post I am still not convinced that the OP was
> in good faith to improve R a
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_correctness> in 2004, and named
> it the most politically
> incorrect term of that year."
>
> The one thing "slave" does not mean in technology is any kind of human
> being.
>
> On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 21:51, Benjami
s are
> totally aside from what I assume is your main point, and because of this my
> first reaction was don't feed the trolls.
>
> My $0.02.
>
> -Roy
>
>> On Sep 19, 2019, at 2:51 AM, Benjamin Lang wrote:
>>
>> Dear Richard,
>>
&g
Dear Richard,
Thank you, that’s interesting. There is also something called an “etymological
fallacy”. I think current usage is more useful here than the “science of
truth”, i.e. the Ancient Greek idea that the (sometimes inferred) derivation of
a word allows us to grasp “the truth of it”.
In
he historically
inclined, it does not make much of a difference whether the term evokes the
Roman, Greek, American or modern kind of slavery for you: it is as
disgusting as it gets.
Thank you,
Ben
--
Benjamin Lang, PhD
http://orcid.org/-0001-6358-8380
Marie Sklodowska-Curie Postdoctoral Fell
6 matches
Mail list logo
