time of the day.
Thank you again for your help.
Best Regards,
Aneeta
Clint Bowman wrote:
>
> Aneeta,
>
> My "gorilla and mouse" analogies were referring to the magnitude of
> the disturbance and also to its time signature. Are you only
> interested in the large
e recorded by nodes. In a
simple way we may look at it as a set of X(time) and Y(temperature) values
where I am trying to define Y in terms of X.
How should I approach this problem?
Many Thanks,
Aneeta
Clint Bowman wrote:
>
> Aneeta,
>
> If I understand the figure at
> <htt
there is any abnormality. Each node should have
its own expectation model (i.e. there will be no correlation between the
readings of the different nodes).
Steve Lianoglou-6 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Oct 21, 2009, at 12:31 PM, Aneeta wrote:
>
>>
>> Greetings!
>>
>&
attached graph for further reference.
http://www.nabble.com/file/p25995874/Regression%2BModel%2Bfor%2BNode%2B1%2BDay%2B1.png
Regression+Model+for+Node+1+Day+1.png
I would really appreciate if you could suggest the correct approach to
building such a prediction model.
Many thanks,
Aneeta
4 matches
Mail list logo