Re: [R] SVM probability output variation

2009-10-21 Thread Anders Carlsson
Hi, > > > If I instead output the decision values, the whole procedure is > > fully reproducible, i.e. the exact same values are returned when I > > retrain the model. > > By the decision values, you mean the predict labels, right? The output of decision values can be turned on in the predict.s

Re: [R] SVM probability output variation

2009-10-21 Thread Anders Carlsson
Hi again, and thank you Steve for your reply! > Hi Anders, > > On Oct 21, 2009, at 8:49 AM, Anders Carlsson wrote: > > > Dear R:ers, > > > > I'm using the svm from the e1071 package to train a model with the > > option "probabilities = TRUE".

[R] SVM probability output variation

2009-10-21 Thread Anders Carlsson
Dear R:ers, I'm using the svm from the e1071 package to train a model with the option "probabilities = TRUE". I then use "predict" with "probabilities = TRUE" and get the probabilities for the data point belonging to either class. So far all is well. My question is why I get different result

Re: [R] Pausing R

2009-10-19 Thread Anders Carlsson
Peter Dalgaard wrote: Anders Carlsson wrote: Hello, I’m currently running a script that takes several days to complete, and have therefore chosen to start two instances of R, each doing half the work (since I have a two-processor machine). The problem is that this renders my computer

[R] Pausing R

2009-10-19 Thread Anders Carlsson
Hello, I’m currently running a script that takes several days to complete, and have therefore chosen to start two instances of R, each doing half the work (since I have a two-processor machine). The problem is that this renders my computer worthless to do other work on. So - is it possible to