There are programming languages where something like pipe notation is all
but inevitable, being trivally programmer-definable. What they have in
common is that a partially applied function is a function value, and the
pipe operator is semantically just another yawn ho-hum higher order
function wit
On doing things with SQL commands, well THERE is a language that has grown
and changed a lot. And a language in which obviously equivalent things
aren’t because of SQL’s inconsistent three-valued logic. With a really big
standard and a dizzying array of implementations that fail to conform in oh
I did not intend to segue into the fates of other languages except insofar as R
is like many others that can be evolving while both attracting new "clients"
and uses and shedding others including g some who decide some other language
may suit them best.
I am happy to hear versions of PASCAL are
I'll add that my current favorite editor is CudaText, written in Object Pascal.
(And I too am a fan of Double Commander.)
---JRG
On Sunday, June 15th, 2025 at 9:19 AM, J C Nash wrote:
>
>
> Pascal is still used, though sometimes under slightly different names. An
> actively maintained
> p
Pascal is still used, though sometimes under slightly different names. An
actively maintained
piece of software I use extensively is Double Commander. This is built using
Free Pascal, which
will (at last try) run my 1989 "Compact Numerical Methods" codes. If you use
optim(), you are
using my "B
5 matches
Mail list logo
