Re: [R] Unintended behaviour of stats::time not returning integers for the first cycle

> did not know which mailing list to write to. ... then you did not read the Posting Guide, or forgot to refer to it? On October 18, 2022 5:26:28 AM PDT, "Andreï V. Kostyrka" wrote: >Sure, this works, and I was thinking about this solution, but it seems like >a dirty one-time trick. I was wonde

Re: [R] Unintended behaviour of stats::time not returning integers for the first cycle

The zoo package implements tolerances internally. Converting the ts object to zoo: library(zoo) identical(as.integer(time(as.zoo(x))), true.year) ## [1] TRUE On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 3:26 AM Andreï V. Kostyrka wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > I was using stats::time to obtain the year as a floo

[R] [R-pkgs] SCpubr: Generate high quality, publication-ready plots of single-cell transcriptomics data.

Dear R community, It is my pleasure to announce that my new R package (*SCpubr *) to generate *high-quality, publication-ready plots* for *single-cell transcriptomics* data has been released *on CRAN *.

Re: [R] Unintended behaviour of stats::time not returning integers for the first cycle

Sure, this works, and I was thinking about this solution, but it seems like a dirty one-time trick. I was wondering whether the following 3 lines could be considered for inclusion by the core developers, but did not know which mailing list to write to. Here is my proposal: correctTime <- function

Re: [R] statistical error in ggerrorplot argument desc_statby

While I agree that S.E. and S.D. are sometimes confused I disagree that the definition and use must be rehashed in every package that uses either one. The programmer (and documentation writer) makes tools available. If they do a good job with documentation then it is more likely that the tool wi