If they can't work out how to resize an image, a 300 dpi resolution
leaves you with an image a bit over 37 mm wide. Doesn't add up for me.
Jim
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 10:00 AM bharat rawlley
wrote:
>
> I tried doing that.
>
> So the real title of my graph is much longer than men and women and is
Hi Silvano,
I was completely stumped by your problem until I looked through Petr's
response and guessed that you wanted the largest sum of 'Var.1"
constrained by the specified numbers in your three schemes. I think
this is what you want, but I haven't checked it exhaustively.
set.seed(123)
Var.1 <
Hi Xiaoyu,
"non-zero exit status" is just a fancy way of saying something went
wrong. An old computing convention is for a function to return zero
(FALSE) for success or some positive integer that tells you what the
error was. In general, when you have a sequence of interdependent
functions or prog
I tried doing that.
So the real title of my graph is much longer than men and women and isn't not
being incorporated in that width.
I think I'll have to settle for a smaller title
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 at 6:54 PM, Jim Lemon wrote: Ah,
an _upper_ limit. Why
Ah, an _upper_ limit. Why not let tiff() work out the resolution
(res=NA - the default) and see if that passes muster.
Jim
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 8:42 AM bharat rawlley wrote:
>
> I am able to change but the place where I have to submit a similar graph has
> kept a fixed upper limit of 440 pix
This is beginning to sound like a stats taliban fatwa. I don't care if
you're using an abacus, you want to get the correct result. My guess
is that the different instantiations of the Hochberg adjustment are
using different algorithms to calculate the result. The Hochberg
adjustment is known to be
I am able to change but the place where I have to submit a similar graph has
kept a fixed upper limit of 440 pixels for the width and an upper limit of 300
for the dpi.
On Tuesday, 24 August, 2021, 06:36:16 pm GMT-4, Jim Lemon
wrote:
Hi bharat,
I think there is a conflict between your
Hi bharat,
I think there is a conflict between your image size and resolution.
You need a lot larger height and width in pixels to get 300 dpi
resolution for the whole plot.
tiff("test.tiff", units = "px", width = 2200, height = 1250, res = 300)
would probably do it for you. How come you can't c
1. Why not installed a pre-built binary for Windows? (No need to reply
... Just saying.)
2. You should post the results of sessionInfo() to better enable
others to help you.
Also post any error or diagnostic messages you received.
Cheers,
Bert
Bert Gunter
"The trouble with having an open mind i
Hello, I made the following graph in R with the following code.
ggplot(aes(x=factor(year), y=percentage, color = Gender, fill=Gender), data =
graph_text)+ geom_bar(position = 'dodge', stat='identity')+ theme_classic()+
scale_y_continuous(limits=c(0, 1.4*ymax))+ labs(x= 'Year', y = 'Percentage
Per the posting guide, statistics issues are generally off topic on this list:
"Questions about statistics: The R mailing lists are primarily
intended for questions and discussion about the R software. However,
questions about statistical methodology are sometimes posted. If the
question is well-as
On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 14:44:55 +
David Swanepoel wrote:
> Dear R Core Dev Team, I hope all is well your side!
> My apologies if this is not the correct point of contact to use to
> address this. If not, kindly advise or forward my request to the
> relevant team/persons.
>
> I have a query re
Hi all.
I installed the latest R and Rtools, and I followed the guidelines to test
the installation of Rtools (rtools40v2-x86_64.exe for windows10). I
verified that *make* can be found, but I still could not install an R
package from the source.
Any ideas?
*More detailed info:*
https://github.co
Hi R-Help,
Data is below. I used a Kruskal Wallis to compare across 4 study groups for
my DV (beta - this is highly non-normal). Now I want to add a covariate
(cpz).
1) What package do I use and how do I specify the model? (I tried T.aov
from fANCOVA but received a lot of simpleLoess errors)
2)
Dear Bert,
Thanks for your prompt response. I used R-help as it was listed as the contact
point in the Description file of the stats package.
I'll attempt to find more information from stats.stackexchange.com as suggested
and also see if I can figure out the sci.stat.consult and sci.stat.math U
> Bert Gunter
> on Tue, 24 Aug 2021 10:50:50 -0700 writes:
> 1. No Excel attachments made it through. Binary
> attachments are generally stripped by the list server for
> security reasons.
> 2. As you may have already learned, this is the wrong
> forum for statist
1. No Excel attachments made it through. Binary attachments are
generally stripped by the list server for security reasons.
2. As you may have already learned, this is the wrong forum for
statistics or package specific questions. Read *and follow* the
posting guide linked below to post on r-help a
Hi.
Now it is understandable. However the solution is not clear for me.
table(Order$Var.1[1:10])
A B C D
4 1 2 3
should give you a hint which scheme could be acceptable, but how to do it
programmatically I do not know.
maybe to start with lower value in the table call and gradually increse
18 matches
Mail list logo
