OK -- you were referring explicitly to the function call. That's what I
missed. Apologies for the noise.
-- Bert
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 3:19 PM Benjamin Tyner wrote:
>
> On 6/20/20 5:49 PM, Bert Gunter wrote:
> > Gents:
> > (with trepidation)
> >
> > f(x = 3, y = g(expr))
> > **already** evalu
On 6/20/20 5:49 PM, Bert Gunter wrote:
Gents:
(with trepidation)
f(x = 3, y = g(expr))
**already** evaluates g in the environment of f, **not** in the
environment of the caller.
(This does not contradict Duncan's example -- 3 is a constant, not a
variable).
e.g.
> f <- function(x = 3, y =
Gents:
(with trepidation)
f(x = 3, y = g(expr))
**already** evaluates g in the environment of f, **not** in the environment
of the caller.
(This does not contradict Duncan's example -- 3 is a constant, not a
variable).
e.g.
> f <- function(x = 3, y = x^2 +k){
+ k <- 3
+ x + y
+ }
Ergo
>
On 2020-06-20 07:29 -0700, Bert Gunter wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:17 PM Rasmus Liland wrote:
> > On 2020-06-19 18:33 -0700, Bert Gunter wrote:
> > > Why aren't you posting on the
> > > Bioconductor Help forum instead
> >
> > Perhaps r-sig-genetics@ or r-sig-phylo@?
>
> genetics is not
I have a problem running SEM using lavaan. I have 44 items on likert scale. I
would like to develop a model containing two latent factors. This is the model
I have constructed:
library(lavaan)
library(sem)
library(haven)
getwd()
View(Dissertation)
kashk <- c(Dissertation$Q1, Dissertation$Q2, Diss
Dear learned experts of R,
I was writing a book through RStudio-Rmarkdown and had finally compiled it
successfully based on R package R-3.6.2. Afterwards, I updated my R-3.6.2
to R-4.0.0 and even later to R-4.0.1.
Then, the publishers demanded to recompile the book with font embedding, so
I tried
On 20/06/2020 4:44 p.m., Benjamin Tyner wrote:
On 6/20/20 9:00 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
How about
g <- function(x, y = x) {
f(x, y)
}
g(x = 3)
or even
yEqualsX <- function(f) function(x, y = x) f(x, y)
yEqualsX(f)(x = 3)
These are a lot like currying, but aren't currying, so they may be
On 6/20/20 9:00 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
How about
g <- function(x, y = x) {
f(x, y)
}
g(x = 3)
or even
yEqualsX <- function(f) function(x, y = x) f(x, y)
yEqualsX(f)(x = 3)
These are a lot like currying, but aren't currying, so they may be
acceptable to you. Personally I'd choose the f
genetics is not genomics. Nor are phylogenies. I still believe Bioc is the
right resource.
Bert Gunter
"The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and
sticking things into it."
-- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip )
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at
On 20/06/2020 7:15 a.m., Benjamin Tyner wrote:
Greetings,
Occasionally, I desire to call a function with one argument set to equal
to another. Here is a toy example:
f <- function(x, y) {
x + y
}
f(x = 3, y = x) # Error in f(x = 3, y = x) : object 'x' not found
So far
Hi Ben,
How about something like this:
f <- function(x, y = NULL) {
if (is.null(y))
y <- x
x + y
}
> f(3, 4)
[1] 7
> f(3)
[1] 6
Regards,
Marc Schwartz
> On Jun 20, 2020, at 7:15 AM, Benjamin Tyner wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> Occasionally, I desire to call a function with one arg
Greetings,
Occasionally, I desire to call a function with one argument set to equal
to another. Here is a toy example:
f <- function(x, y) {
x + y
}
f(x = 3, y = x) # Error in f(x = 3, y = x) : object 'x' not found
So far, the most concise way I found to accomplish this is:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 19:36:41 -0500
Ana Marija wrote:
> Error in cat(x, file = file, sep = c(rep.int(sep, ncolumns - 1),
> "\n"), : argument 1 (type 'list') cannot be handled by 'cat'
It might be a good idea to try to solve problems like this yourself
instead of waiting for hours for someone to
On 20/06/20 3:57 pm, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
?scale_x_discrete, in particular the expand argument.
Thanks Jeff. Took me a while to get my head around it (I'm slow!!!) but
I eventually got it.
For the record, what I needed to do was set:
ldCiPlot <- ldCiPlot + scale_x_discrete(expand=expan
14 matches
Mail list logo
