Ok I understand. I wasn't intended to look as complaining, sorry.
It was interesting to get the pointview of a developer (thanks JC Nash).
To code a new package comprising useful but deprecated functions is a very
good advice, thanks, I will try to hone my coding skills to do so (and to
be more i
Dear Gabriele,
I'm glad that you were able to solve your problem. I spent a bit of time today
updating my R from 3.6.0 to 3.6.1 and updating all R packages on Ubuntu, and,
for what is now an obvious reason, I was unable to duplicate the problem.
Saving the .Rhistory file is benign but saving th
Experienced R users avoid creating .Rdata files (with nothing in front of the
period) because R will automatically load them and any mistakes recorded there
can interfere with future uses of R when started from the directory containing
that file. RData files with something in front of the period
I managed to get Rcmdr working simply by deleting the .Rdata and .Rhistory
file from the work directory. It is rather weird, as I thought they only
contained data and settings, but probably some of these belonged to the
older version of R/Rcmdr and were not compatible with the new version.
I'll kee
Thanks for your answer. I try this trick:
mkdir packages
sudo chmod -R a+w packages
ls -al
drwxrwxrwx��� 2 marcgirondot staff� 64� 6 d�c 17:20 packages
Now in R
> require(devtools)
>
> install_version("raster", version = "2.5-8", repos
="http://cran.us.r-project.org";,
��� lib="/Use
I'm writing a quite large document in Rmarkdown which has financial data in it.
I format that data using scales::dollar() currently something like this:
>
> require (scales)
> x = 10
> cat (dollar (x, prefix ="£", big.mark=","))
£100,000
But actually, I'd quite like to get £100k out in tha
Hallo
I've been using R and R commander (Rcmdr) for some years, never had
problems. I'm on Xubuntu 16.04. Yesterday I updated R from 3.4.4 to 3.6.1
and all sorts of problems occurred. Firstly I completely removed R from my
system, including old directories (with some hiccups, I must admit). Then I
> Richard O'Keefe
> on Fri, 6 Dec 2019 12:18:50 +1300 writes:
> This particular task is not a problem about R.
> It is a problem n combinatorics.
> Start with the obvious brute force algorithm
> (1) Let S be the union of all the sets
> (2) For each K in 0 .. |S|
8 matches
Mail list logo
