On 29/04/2019 9:44 p.m., Rolf Turner wrote:
On 30/04/19 1:31 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 29/04/2019 9:25 p.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 29/04/2019 8:43 p.m., Rolf Turner wrote:
On 30/04/19 12:19 PM, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
Since you now have this indirect dependency, you should make sure y
On 30/04/19 1:31 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 29/04/2019 9:25 p.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 29/04/2019 8:43 p.m., Rolf Turner wrote:
On 30/04/19 12:19 PM, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
Since you now have this indirect dependency, you should make sure you
have updated this gaggle of packages. I h
On 29/04/2019 9:25 p.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 29/04/2019 8:43 p.m., Rolf Turner wrote:
On 30/04/19 12:19 PM, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
Since you now have this indirect dependency, you should make sure you
have updated this gaggle of packages. I have found that the
dependencies do not necessar
On 29/04/2019 8:43 p.m., Rolf Turner wrote:
On 30/04/19 12:19 PM, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
Since you now have this indirect dependency, you should make sure you
have updated this gaggle of packages. I have found that the
dependencies do not necessarily update when I update the package that
relies
On 30/04/19 12:01 PM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
Hi Guys,
I suspect that this entry from news() for 3.6.0 is relevant:
"When loading namespaces, S3 method registrations which overwrite
previous registrations are now noted by default (using
packageStartupMessage())."
Always a good idea to read th
On 30/04/19 12:19 PM, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
Since you now have this indirect dependency, you should make sure you
have updated this gaggle of packages. I have found that the
dependencies do not necessarily update when I update the package that
relies on them. It can take a few passes of readi
Since you now have this indirect dependency, you should make sure you have
updated this gaggle of packages. I have found that the dependencies do not
necessarily update when I update the package that relies on them. It can take a
few passes of reading error/warming messages to get them all upda
Hi Guys,
I suspect that this entry from news() for 3.6.0 is relevant:
"When loading namespaces, S3 method registrations which overwrite previous
registrations are now noted by default (using packageStartupMessage())."
Always a good idea to read the NEWS file with a x.y point release. Peter
us
On 30/04/19 11:08 AM, Bert Gunter wrote:
Offlist, as this might be complete baloney.
Thanks Bert.
I am CC-ing this reply to the r-help list since your suggestion is *NOT*
complete baloney at all!
What dependencies does your package have? -- is it possible that some of
these dependent pa
I just installed the latest version of R on my laptop (running Ubuntu
18.04; used "sudo apt-get install r-base".)
Now when I load a package that I have written I get a message on screen:
Registered S3 methods overwritten by 'ggplot2':
method from
[.quosures rlang
c.quosu
I should have added: for multivariate gam models see e.g. ?mvn
Bert Gunter
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:51 AM Bert Gunter wrote:
> "but this package do not support multivariate regression."
> Wrong.
>
> "Fits a generalized additive model (GAM) to data, the term ‘GAM’ being
> taken to include any
Hello.
I have a question from kamila package. I run this package on my data and
the database is on SQL server. now, I have an error that I don't know what
should I do.
kamrespresc<-kamila(conVarsPresc,catVarsFacPresc,numClust=3,numInit=10)
Error in matrix(data = log(gtools::rdirichlet(n = numClust,
Hello.
I have a question from kamila package. I run this package on my data and
the database is on SQL server. now, I have an error that I don't know what
should I do.
kamrespresc<-kamila(conVarsPresc,catVarsFacPresc,numClust=3,numInit=10)
Error in matrix(data = log(gtools::rdirichlet(n = numClust,
"but this package do not support multivariate regression."
Wrong.
"Fits a generalized additive model (GAM) to data, the term ‘GAM’ being
taken to include any quadratically penalized GLM and a variety of other
models estimated by a quadratically penalised likelihood type approach (see
family.mgcv <
Dear all,
I want to do a multivariate regression. So I have Y which is a matrix and
one vector x which is my predictor variable. I want to do a multivariate
regression with penalizing the coefficients I get. Something like: $||y-xb||
+ \lambda b^t P b $ But I have a "own" penalty term which I want
15 matches
Mail list logo
