Although I already tried to install this package at my RStudio, I can't manage
to do it. Would you have any hint to help me solving this problem.
Thanks and greetings Mateus Coelho Silva
br.linkedin.com/in/mateuscoelhos
(Tel/WApp: +55 31 88535135)
-Graduando em Engenharia de Controle e Automação -
> >
> > Yes, that is what I thought so too earlier (and indeed is still true, sorry
> > about that). The whole issue started at my end because I misremembered
> > about plotmath which is neither a function nor a package.
> >
> >> Perhaps install.packages() should give a different error message wh
On 12/12/2015 1:35 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
install.packages('grDevices')
Installing package into ‘/usr/lib64/R/library’
(as ‘lib’ is unspecified)
Warning message:
package ‘grDevices’ is not available (for R version 3.2.2)
However, this is no longer an issue for me: I seem to have it installed
> Hadley Wickham
> on Sat, 12 Dec 2015 08:08:54 -0600 writes:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 3:54 AM, Martin Maechler
> wrote:
>>> Henrik Bengtsson on
>>> Fri, 11 Dec 2015 08:20:55 -0800 writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 8:10 AM, David Winsemius
> On Dec 12, 2015, at 12:33 PM, Ranjan Maitra
> wrote:
>
>> A couple of things:
>>
>> First, there is a SIG list specifically for R on Fedora and RHEL
>> distributions and their derivatives:
>>
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
>>
>> Second, how did you install R? If yo
> A couple of things:
>
> First, there is a SIG list specifically for R on Fedora and RHEL
> distributions and their derivatives:
>
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
>
> Second, how did you install R? If you used the precompiled binary RPMS for
> Fedora that are available
> On Dec 12, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Ranjan Maitra
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 10:51:16 -0600 Marc Schwartz wrote:
>
>>
>>> On Dec 12, 2015, at 10:47 AM, Ranjan Maitra
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I recently needed to install a fresh OS (Fedora 23, where R 3.2.2 is the
>>> latest), an
On 12/12/2015 12:32 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 10:51:16 -0600 Marc Schwartz wrote:
On Dec 12, 2015, at 10:47 AM, Ranjan Maitra
wrote:
Hi,
I recently needed to install a fresh OS (Fedora 23, where R 3.2.2 is the
latest), and which meant everything has to be installed fr
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 10:51:16 -0600 Marc Schwartz wrote:
>
> > On Dec 12, 2015, at 10:47 AM, Ranjan Maitra
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I recently needed to install a fresh OS (Fedora 23, where R 3.2.2 is the
> > latest), and which meant everything has to be installed from scratch. In so
Hi Dr. Viechtbauer,
Thank you very much. Putting in sei=se in forest() fixed the problem.
Thanks for your help.
On 8 December 2015 at 08:37, Viechtbauer Wolfgang (STAT) <
wolfgang.viechtba...@maastrichtuniversity.nl> wrote:
> The first and second argument of forest() (or more precisely,
> fores
> On Dec 12, 2015, at 10:47 AM, Ranjan Maitra
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I recently needed to install a fresh OS (Fedora 23, where R 3.2.2 is the
> latest), and which meant everything has to be installed from scratch. In so
> doing, I got the somewhat familiar:
>
>> install.packages('plotmath')
>
Hi,
I recently needed to install a fresh OS (Fedora 23, where R 3.2.2 is the
latest), and which meant everything has to be installed from scratch. In so
doing, I got the somewhat familiar:
>install.packages('plotmath')
Installing package into ‘/usr/lib64/R/library’
(as ‘lib’ is unspecified)
War
No, this is not possible. But you can just add the weights yourself. One
difficulty here is that you want the weights to the right of the estimates and
corresponding CIs and those are always placed at the right of the figure. One
possibility would be to make the right margin large and then use m
Dear Carlijn
I wonder whether
http://www.metafor-project.org/doku.php/tips:comp_two_independent_estimates
answers your question? If you had given us an example of your fitting
procedure we might know for sure.
On 12/12/2015 15:35, Carlijn . wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question about doing
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 3:54 AM, Martin Maechler
> wrote:
>>> Henrik Bengtsson
>>> on Fri, 11 Dec 2015 08:20:55 -0800 writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 8:10 AM, David Winsemius
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Dec
On 12/12/2015 9:08 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 3:54 AM, Martin Maechler
wrote:
Henrik Bengtsson
on Fri, 11 Dec 2015 08:20:55 -0800 writes:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 8:10 AM, David Winsemius
wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 11, 2015, at 5:38 AM, Dario Beraldi
**If** I understand correctly, this is because of correlation in
effects due to non-independence between males and females in the data.
As this is primarily a statistical, not an R programming, issue, I
suggest you post on a statistics list like stats.stackexchange.com.
Better yet, talk with a loca
Hi all,
I have a question about doing a meta-analysis, in particular a three-level
meta-analysis using Metafor.
I have estimated the mean overall effect size of males by using two different
ways:
1. moderator analysis (male = 0, female = 1) using the whole data set
2. intercept-only model
On 12/12/2015 8:44 AM, peter dalgaard wrote:
On 12 Dec 2015, at 10:54 , Martin Maechler wrote:
My conclusion: Breaking such a fundamental lemma of logic as
"the empty set is always true"
Umm, that doesn't make sense to me. Surely you mean that "an AND-operation over an
empty index set is
Many thanks to Professor Michael Dewey for his time.
I apologize for the error about the claim to obtain weights from escalc and I
realise that the weights are a function of the fit, not the data.
weights(res) is OK to extract the weights from the fitted object and to put
them in the data fram
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 3:54 AM, Martin Maechler
wrote:
>> Henrik Bengtsson
>> on Fri, 11 Dec 2015 08:20:55 -0800 writes:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 8:10 AM, David Winsemius
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Dec 11, 2015, at 5:38 AM, Dario Beraldi
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> On 12 Dec 2015, at 10:54 , Martin Maechler wrote:
>
> My conclusion: Breaking such a fundamental lemma of logic as
> "the empty set is always true"
Umm, that doesn't make sense to me. Surely you mean that "an AND-operation over
an empty index set is TRUE"? A similar OR operation is FALSE,
Please have a look at
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5963269/how-to-make-a-great-r-reproducible-example
and/or http://adv-r.had.co.nz/Reproducibility.html
It appears that you posted in HTML and the results are very close to unreadable.
Please resend in plain text.
John Kane
Kingston ON Can
> Henrik Bengtsson
> on Fri, 11 Dec 2015 08:20:55 -0800 writes:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 8:10 AM, David Winsemius
wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 11, 2015, at 5:38 AM, Dario Beraldi
wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I'd like to understand the reason why stopifnot
24 matches
Mail list logo
