Hi I was fitting this model with two matrices. But this bifit function
didnt run in my R studio and i got error message. Could anyone guide me how
to install this command. I am giving that command below to have better
understanding.
x.f <- cbind(log(Q5.all.pf), log(Q5.all.pf)^2)
y.f <- t(log(mx5x5
On the left panel of http://www.r-project.org/ , there is a link
titled "Wiki" which points to http://rwiki.sciviews.org/ . However,
this link is broken and gives a 404 Not Found error. Could you please
fix it?
thanks
raju
__
R-help@r-project.org mailin
i want to analyse survival data using typeI HALF LOGISTIC
DISTRIBUTION.how can i go about it?it installed one on R in the
survival package didn't include the distribution...or i need a code to
use maximum likelihood to estimate the parameter in survival
analysis.a typical example of distribution ot
On Thu, 25 Dec 2014, Bert Gunter wrote:
You persist in failing to read the docs!
"the docs" -- do those exclude those I have been quoting and linking to?
Moreover, neither Hadley Wickham, nor anyone else, is the authoritative
source for R usage (other than for the (many!) packages he, himsel
On Thu, 25 Dec 2014, David Winsemius wrote:
On Dec 25, 2014, at 1:04 AM, Mike Miller wrote:
I just wanted to put this out there. It's just some of my observations
about things that happen with R, or happened in this particular
investigation. There were definitely some lessons for me in thi
> On Dec 25, 2014, at 1:04 AM, Mike Miller wrote:
>
> I just wanted to put this out there. It's just some of my observations about
> things that happen with R, or happened in this particular investigation.
> There were definitely some lessons for me in this, and maybe that will be
> true of
You persist in failing to read the docs! Moreover, neither Hadley
Wickham, nor anyone else, is the authoritative source for R usage
(other than for the (many!) packages he, himself has authored). R's
Help pages and manuals -- and ultimately the source code -- are the
only such source.
?factor says
On Thu, 25 Dec 2014, Mike Miller wrote:
I was going to ask a question about it how to test that an object is a
vector, but then I found this:
"is.vector() does not test if an object is a vector. Instead it returns
TRUE only if the object is a vector with no attributes apart from names.
Use i
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Mike Miller wrote:
> I do think I get what is going on with this, but why should I buy into this
> conceptualization? Why is it better to say that a matrix *is* a vector than
> to say that a matrix *contains* a vector? The latter seems to be the more
> common way
On 25/12/2014 3:59 PM, Bert Gunter wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Duncan Murdoch
> wrote:
>> Would you say a cube contains a polygon, or a cube is a polygon?
>
> Neither, actually. I'd say a cube is a polyhedron or a square is a polygon.
>
> :-)
>
> But point taken, of course.
I ha
On Thu, 25 Dec 2014, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 25/12/2014 1:57 PM, Mike Miller wrote:
I do think I get what is going on with this, but why should I buy into
this conceptualization? Why is it better to say that a matrix *is* a
vector than to say that a matrix *contains* a vector? The latter s
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> Would you say a cube contains a polygon, or a cube is a polygon?
Neither, actually. I'd say a cube is a polyhedron or a square is a polygon.
:-)
But point taken, of course.
Cheers,
Bert
Bert Gunter
Genentech Nonclinical Biostatist
Thanks, but I was already in touch with Rob Kirkpatrick about it. We all
work together at U Minnesota, or did until Rob went to VCU.
Mike
On Thu, 25 Dec 2014, Uwe Ligges wrote:
This is a rather detailed analysis, thanks, but I think it should be
send to the maintainer of the "RFGLS" package
On 25/12/2014 1:57 PM, Mike Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Dec 2014, peter dalgaard wrote:
>
>>
>>> On 25 Dec 2014, at 08:15 , Mike Miller wrote:
>>>
"is.vector returns TRUE if x is a vector of the specified mode having
no attributes other than names. It returns FALSE otherwise."
>>>
>
This is a rather detailed analysis, thanks, but I think it should be
send to the maintainer of the "RFGLS" package (CCing).
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 25.12.2014 10:04, Mike Miller wrote:
I just wanted to put this out there. It's just some of my observations
about things that happen with R, or happ
On Thu, 25 Dec 2014, peter dalgaard wrote:
On 25 Dec 2014, at 08:15 , Mike Miller wrote:
"is.vector returns TRUE if x is a vector of the specified mode having
no attributes other than names. It returns FALSE otherwise."
So that means that a vector in R has no attributes other than names.
On 25/12/2014 14:26, Ivan Calandra wrote:
Dear useRs,
I have just upgraded to R 3.1.2 for MacOS 10.6.8 (with the binary for
Snow Leopard).
Rather belatedly
Everything is fine except that I get an error when loading TclTk:
>library(tcltk)
Error : .onLoad a échoué dans loadNamespace() po
Dear useRs,
I have just upgraded to R 3.1.2 for MacOS 10.6.8 (with the binary for
Snow Leopard).
Everything is fine except that I get an error when loading TclTk:
>library(tcltk)
Error : .onLoad a échoué dans loadNamespace() pour 'tcltk', détails :
appel : system2("otool", c("-L", shQuote(DL
> On 25 Dec 2014, at 08:15 , Mike Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> "is.vector returns TRUE if x is a vector of the specified mode having
>> no attributes other than names. It returns FALSE otherwise."
>
> So that means that a vector in R has no attributes other than names.
Wrong. Read carefully. There a
On Thu, 25 Dec 2014, Mike Miller wrote:
On Thu, 25 Dec 2014, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
You have written a lot, Mike, as though we did not know it. You are
not the only one with math and multiple computing languages under your
belt.
I'm not assuming that you and Bert don't know things, but I do
On Thu, 25 Dec 2014, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
You have written a lot, Mike, as though we did not know it. You are not
the only one with math and multiple computing languages under your belt.
I'm not assuming that you and Bert don't know things, but I do expect to
have a wider audience -- when I
I just wanted to put this out there. It's just some of my observations
about things that happen with R, or happened in this particular
investigation. There were definitely some lessons for me in this, and
maybe that will be true of someone else. The main thing I picked up is
that it is good
You have written a lot, Mike, as though we did not know it. You are not the
only one with math and multiple computing languages under your belt. The point
Bert made is that the concept that a matrix IS-A vector is not just an
implementation detail in R... it helps the practitioner keep straight
23 matches
Mail list logo
