dear experts
I'd like to ask you, probably on behalf all of us who try to
use AMD's ACML for performance optimisation a question.
There seem to be problem when these two, R and ACML are
coupled,
described here:
http://devgurus.amd.com/message/1255852#1255852
I'd like to ask, while not being
he posting guide
and check the manuals before posting.
On 25/02/2014 08:42, lejeczek wrote:
dear experts
I'd like to ask you, probably on behalf all of us who try
to use AMD's
ACML for performance optimisation a question.
There seem to be problem when these two, R and ACML are
coup
dear developers
I myself am not a prog-devel, I found this
http://devgurus.amd.com/message/1255852#1255852
Most R compilations/installations I use seem to fail this
test, is this a problem and if yes then how serious is it?
regards
__
R-devel@r-pr
"most...seem to fail" is not enough to act upon. What exactly did you do, on
which computing platform, and what happened that makes you believe that it had failed?
-pd
On 27 Jun 2014, at 13:38 , lejeczek wrote:
dear developers
I myself am not a prog-devel, I found this
http://devg
m Callaway from Red Hat.
Martyn
On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 12:13 +0100, lejeczek wrote:
later I tried plain-vanilla, well.. redhats' and derivatives
default packages and they all fail:
> ## PR#4582 %*% with NAs
> stopifnot(is.na(NA %*% 0), is.na(0 %*% NA))
> ## depended on the BLAS in us
On 10/07/14 06:45, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On 09/07/2014 17:17, lejeczek wrote:
I wonder if anyone amongst developers had a chance to try
ACML.
Yes, and documented its use in the R manual over many years.
AMD's implementation when R is supposed to use it seems
to fail the test
simi
hi guys,
I'd like to ask, and I believe this place here should be best as who can
know better, if building R with different compilers and opt flags is
something worth investing time into?
Or maybe this a subject that somebody has already investigated. If yes
what then are the conclusion?
Reason
On 13/06/2019 16:14, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 13 June 2019 at 16:05, lejeczek via R-devel wrote:
> | I'd like to ask, and I believe this place here should be best as who can
> | know better, if building R with different compilers and opt flags is
> | something worth in
Hi guys,
I want to ask devel for who knows better - having multiple
nodes serving users home dirs off the same shared network
filesystem : are there any precautions or must-dos &
must-donts in order to assure healthy and efficient parallel
Rs running simultaneously - and I don't mean obvious stuff
dear devel,
I thought you guys would know best - I have an R which fails to get
communicate outside via a proxy, and Squid's logs show:
...
1581432434.501 0 10.5.8.17 TAG_NONE/400 4064 %C5/%B6* -
HIER_NONE/- text/html
1581432497.231 0 10.5.8.17 TAG_NONE/400 4570 NONE
error:invalid-req
On 11/02/2020 14:54, lejeczek via R-devel wrote:
> dear devel,
>
> I thought you guys would know best - I have an R which fails to get
> communicate outside via a proxy, and Squid's logs show:
>
> ...
>
> 1581432434.501 0 10.5.8.17 TAG_NONE/400 4064 %C5/%
I'm not sure if I should bother you team with this,
apologies in case it's a bother.
I'm trying gcc 6.2.1 (from devtoolset-6) with R, everything
seems to work just fine, except for mzR.
Here is failed build:
g++ -m64 -shared -L/usr/lib64/R/lib -Wl,-z,relro -o mzR.so
cramp.o ramp_base64.o ram
ced in an
earlier compilation step; they likely failed in some way,
so you need to provide the complete compilation output.
Did you do this on a version of the package that did not
have any previous build artifacts (e.g., via biocLite() or
from a fresh svn checkout)?
Martin
On 12/21/2016 12:00
13 matches
Mail list logo
