and
"concepts", which are search terms leading to it. For files2.Rd, they are:
\alias{dir.create}
\alias{dir.exists}
\alias{Sys.chmod}
\alias{Sys.umask}
\concept{directory}
\concept{mkdir}
\alias{umask} % for links
(Aliases work with ?
.function.default(x, envir))
If I skip the is.function(x) test and call .Internal directly, I find it
is about 10% faster than `function`. But that is an extremely risky
optimization; it wouldn't be accepted in a CRAN package.
Duncan Murdoch
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
mfortable saying I did what you did.
Please reduce the size of your spreadsheet if you can, and then post
instructions for how to construct it, and what to cut and paste from it.
Then others can try what you did and see if this is specific to your
machine, to that particular version of R-dev
ils dazu.
and so on.
Please ignore this and forgive me if this is an inappropriate post. I am a
N00B in R.
I don't think it is inappropriate.
Duncan Murdoch
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
alled. Otherwise, you'll just need to wait
until the new version shows up on your mirror.
Duncan Murdoch
Will
R Under development (unstable) (2017-09-16 r73293) -- "Unsuffered Consequences"
Copyright (C) 2017 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw
that imitate Excel, then why not do what
they ask?
On the other hand, if they aren't willing to pay for the work, then you
should lecture them on how silly their request is.
In any case, base R functions should not include nonsense, so this is
not something that should go into R.
Duncan
or"]
}
So Peter is right, this would likely work if the current working
directory was the top level directory of the package, but it can't work
in general.
The easiest fix would probably be to change the code underlying R CMD
Rd2pdf so that it works from th
could also use
R CMD Rd2pdf .
while in that directory.
Duncan Murdoch
The fact that the output starts by
Hmm ... looks like a package
threw me off. That output suggests it should work, I think. So I would
suggests either
1) handling both package and man directories
2) check that the in
kages() interprets "both" as "source".
The documentation is unclear about this, but the source is pretty
simple. The source to install.packages() is a lot more complicated, but
I believe it would normally interpret "both" as "win.binary" on Windows,
as
s doesn't make sense.
You are pasting an REXP object myDf into a string to evaluate. It would
make sense to assign that dataframe object to an R variable, and paste
the name of that variable into your expression, or to construct a
language object containing the dataframe object, but I don&#
Just print the string you are asking to R to evaluate. It doesn't make
any sense as an R expression. Fix that, and things will work.
Duncan Murdoch
On 27/10/2017 3:41 PM, Morkus via R-devel wrote:
It can't be this hard, right? I really need a shove in the right direction
guess there's something weird about boxMVariable. You should ask
R to print it, and to print str(boxMVariable), to make sure it's a
regular dataframe containing 4 numeric columns and one factor or
character column.
Duncan Murdoch
From this code:
.
.
.
/// assign the data to a varia
On 28/10/2017 7:12 AM, Morkus wrote:
Thanks Duncan. Awesome ideas!
I think we're getting closer!
I tried what you suggested and got a possibly better error...
.
.
.
rConnection.assign("boxMVariable", myDf);
*String resultBV *= *"str(boxMVariable)"*; *// your sugge
On 28/10/2017 8:59 AM, Morkus wrote:
Hey Duncan,
Hard to debug? That's an understatement. Eyes bleeding
In any case, I tried all your suggestions. To get "integer" for the
final column, I had to change the code to get integers instead of strings.
The last column in iri
On 29/10/2017 7:26 AM, Morkus wrote:
Thanks Duncan. I can't tell you how helpful all your terrific replies
have been.
I think the biggest surprise is that nobody appears to be using Java and
R together like I"m trying to do. I suppose it should be a surprise
since there are no bo
ng about this problem is that Tirthankar doesn't
believe that the seed selection process is aware of the function output.
I would say that it must be, and he should be investigating how that
happens if he is worried about the output, he shouldn't be worrying
about R's RNG.
Duncan Mu
On 05/11/2017 10:58 AM, peter dalgaard wrote:
On 5 Nov 2017, at 15:17 , Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 04/11/2017 10:20 PM, Daniel Nordlund wrote:
Tirthankar,
"random number generators" do not produce random numbers. Any given
generator produces a fixed sequence of numbers that appe
e the diff between that and
73908 (which is what the github link showed). I also don't know if
there's a way to show the diff between commit N and N-1 in github if I
only know N.
Duncan Murdoch
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://
On 20/12/2017 6:52 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 20/12/2017 5:48 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Prof Brian Ripley
wrote:
On 20/12/2017 17:42, Winston Chang wrote:
On recent builds of R-devel, R CMD check gives a WARNING when some
compiler warning flags are
one could set up (or already has?) one
of the web viewers (WebSVN, etc.) for the real repository. That would
be better for those of us who are SVN users, but probably harder for Git
users.
Duncan Murdoch
And your description seems wrong:
there is now an _optional_ check controlled by an envir
On 22/12/2017 10:46 AM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
Hi,
See inline below.
On Dec 22, 2017, at 9:12 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
Duncan Murdoch
on Thu, 21 Dec 2017 14:23:13 -0500 writes:
On 21/12/2017 1:02 PM, Winston Chang wrote:
On recent builds of R-devel, R CMD check gives a
WARNING
On 25/12/2017 7:00 AM, Iñaki Úcar wrote:
2017-12-25 12:30 GMT+01:00 Duncan Murdoch :
The one negative aspect of Winston's effort is caused by this weakness. If
you tell me that something happened in revision 73909, I know it was recent.
If you tell me that something appeared in commit 2e
e download still fails, presumably because
something not shown has expired.
Hopefully someone who can actually act on this can figure out what needs
doing.
Duncan Murdoch
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 5:16 PM Bob Rudis wrote:
# A tibble: 13 x 1
site
1 beta.r-project.org
2 bugs.r-p
nstall.packages()` be
accepted by R-core?
R isn't maintained on Github so a PR wouldn't make sense, but I also
doubt the submission of an svn patch would be acted on unless you come
up with some strong arguments about why remotes::install_version doesn't
work properly and ca
as intentional:
- package.skeleton() now explicitly lists all exports in the
‘NAMESPACE’ file.
An earlier version of that message even showed up in the link you posted.
Duncan Murdoch
Dirk
[1] This uses the GitHub mirror rather than svn but the underlyin
On 06/06/2020 3:44 p.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 06/06/2020 3:06 p.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
... [deletions]
In short, 4.0.0 no longer exports via 'exportPattern("^[[:alpha:]]+")'
rendering the new package created non-functional.
Was this intentional, or is this a
On 06/06/2020 4:14 p.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 6 June 2020 at 15:53, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| This change happened in August, 2019, about 10 months ago. Perhaps this
| message asking people to test R-devel is relevant:
|
| https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2020-May/079484.html
ding 'free' to 'Free'.
The same commit made the same kind of change to unix/sys-std.c as well.
Duncan Murdoch
This has nothing to do with the Windows build or installation. Nothing
has changed in the windows build procedure between 4.0.0 and 4.0.1.
_
some weird way. It's fine if you document that it's intended to be
used in some particular way, but why try to prevent me from using it
differently? Just tell me to read the docs when problems arise because
of my misuse and I ask you for help.
Duncan Murdoch
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
ror handling isn't working in your build.
Duncan Murdoch
On 24/06/2020 2:56 p.m., Ryan Novosielski wrote:
Hi there,
I initially asked about this on r-help and was told this might be a better
venue. I’m not really convinced from reading the posting guide, but I’ll give
it a shot. It was also sug
, while asking dirname() and basename() to preserve the
encoding sounds reasonable, it seems like it would just be covering up a
deeper problem.
Duncan Murdoch
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
I don't get any warning (but am using slightly different versions of
everything than you are).
You can find where that message is coming from by running
options(warn=2) first, which will convert it to an error.
Duncan Murdoch
On 10/07/2020 11:54 a.m., Stephen Martin Pederson wrote:
I
nk that would take a really substantial amount of time.
One thing you could do is to create a library on a faster drive, and
install the minimal set of packages there. Then if that library comes
first in .libPaths(), you'll never hit the slow networ
ntributed low level packages.
The stringfish package has a "materialize" function that is advertised
to convert anything to standard format, but it doesn't change x2.
Duncan Murdoch
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
n on text files, so you rarely need an explicit \r\n.
That's the difference between type text and type binary on connections.
Duncan Murdoch
Best regards
Jürgen
PS: Examples from base R:
R seems to use (almost) only "\n" for new lines internally - even on Windows
platfor
to use
it? Maybe.
Duncan Murdoch
On 30/07/2020 3:05 p.m., Tommy Jones wrote:
Hi,
I am constructing a function that does sampling in C++ using a non-R RNG
stream for thread safety reasons. This C++ function is wrapped by an R
function, which is user facing. The R wrapper does some sampling
n't a problem! The practical issue is that by effectively
inventing your own algorithm, you can't rely on the accumulated
experience of everyone else to know whether the generator is good.
Duncan Murdoch
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:36 PM Duncan Murdoch <mailto:murdoch.dun...
ork around this search order, I think the
obvious way is to add your w vector to your d dataframe. That way it is
guaranteed to be found even if there's a conflicting variable in the
formula environment, or the global environment.
Duncan Murdoch
On 09/08/2020 2:13 p.m., John Mount wrot
On 09/08/2020 3:01 p.m., John Mount wrote:
Doesn't this preclude "y ~ ." style notations?
Yes, but you can use "y ~ . - w".
Duncan Murdoch
On Aug 9, 2020, at 11:56 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
This is fairly clearly documented in ?lm:
"All of weights, subs
On 09/08/2020 3:07 p.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 09/08/2020 3:01 p.m., John Mount wrote:
Doesn't this preclude "y ~ ." style notations?
Yes, but you can use "y ~ . - w".
And as was pointed out to me offline, often one doesn't have a simple
vector w giving the
pt in data, in which case emptyenv()
would make more sense (but I haven't tried it, so it might break something).
Duncan Murdoch
But I did not. So I do apologize for both that and for negative tone on my part.
Simplified example:
d <- data.frame(x = 1:3, y = c(1, 2, 1))
w <- c(1, 10,
rs would have been less confusing.
Duncan Murdoch
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
broken links in the future).
Just to be clear: you're giving the current URL, the problem is it's
called "Chapter 6".
Duncan Murdoch
Index: src/library/utils/man/PkgUtils.Rd
===
--- src/library/utils/man/P
CRAN distribution of R.
Duncan Murdoch
On 21/08/2020 12:53 p.m., m15g9g+1dq20lw4vyh1s--- via R-devel wrote:
Thanks for the response. Having spent a lot of the day trying to solve this, as
R is essential for my workflow, I've tried to debug via the binary only as I
haven't yet got the
The lowess() help page refers to documentation in "src/appl/lowess.doc".
This was moved to "src/library/stats/src/lowess.doc" in 2007. This
patch fixes it:
Index: src/library/stats/man/lowess.Rd
===
--- src/library/stats/man/lowe
t in MacOS) doesn't show the full URL
when you hover over the link, as most browsers do. So one could have
\href{https://disney.org}{https://horrible.web.site}
Duncan Murdoch
Cheers,
Simon
On Sep 17, 2020, at 5:35 AM, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
Dear all,
the new CRAN URL checks flag HTT
round this constraint?
Maybe the solution is to put your datasets into the "datasets" package,
or make "survivaldata" a recommended package, or just leave things as
they are and ignore the warnings about package size. I think that's a
negotiation you should have wit
On 24/10/2020 2:00 p.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 24 October 2020 at 05:28, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| they are and ignore the warnings about package size. I think that's a
| negotiation you should have with R Core.
s/R Core/CRAN/ ?
Yes, for that part. The other suggestions need R
of your code) is probably irrelevant
to your problem with vignettes, but things like your .Rbuildignore file
are not.
Duncan Murdoch
On 01/11/2020 11:22 a.m., Alexandre Courtiol wrote:
Dear all,
I am struggling with an issue related to static vignettes: they work, but
only when present in
On 01/11/2020 1:02 p.m., Alexandre Courtiol wrote:
Noted Duncan and TRUE...
I cannot do more immediately unfortunately, that is always the issue of
asking a last minute panic attack question before teaching a course
involving the package...
I do have /doc in my .Rbuildignore for reasons I can
N or other users to run it, because it's too
time-consuming, or needs obscure resources. The CRAN policy discusses this.
Duncan Murdoch
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
On 02/11/2020 4:07 a.m., Mark van der Loo wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 10:39 PM Duncan Murdoch <mailto:murdoch.dun...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 01/11/2020 2:57 p.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> The closest to a canonical reference for a static vignette is the
or? (As far as I can see they are, but maybe I've missed something.)
- Is it a good idea to encode a string value worth of information in the
name, rather than setting the class to something like c("noquote",
"right") instead?
Comments would be welcome.
Duncan Murdoch
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
. There are lots of good packages, and their maintainers should
continue to maintain them.
Duncan Murdoch
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
If these are easy changes, maybe someone will incorporate them. You'll
make the argument stronger for doing that if you can explain why it's
better to do that than to keep them in parallely.
Duncan Murdoch
On 07/11/2020 1:39 p.m., Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
FWIW, there are indeed
ly old code, so I'm not sure what change triggered the
error. I suppose I could bisect commits to find it, but not today.
Duncan Murdoch
On 11/11/2020 8:44 a.m., Kevin R. Coombes wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to figure out how to fix warnings from two of the CRAN
machines on the submission o
It's quite recent (August of this year): see
https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17180.
Duncan Murdoch
/Henrik
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020, 13:58 Gabriel Becker wrote:
Hi all,
I can confirm this occurs for me as well.
The one thing that comes to mind is that there are cert
The fact that Python is different is something that's always going to
cause problems for people who are more familiar with Python. I don't
know Python well enough to list all the gotchas, but I'm sure there are
lots of them.
Duncan Murdoch
Mateo.
--
Mateo Obregón.
On Friday,
<- function() 3
f <- function() return()
f()
which will return 3.
Duncan Murdoch
Mateo.
--
Mateo Obregón.
On Friday, 20 November 2020 22:52:58 GMT Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 20/11/2020 5:36 p.m., Mateo Obregón wrote:
I'm not thinking of complicated cases.
This happened to me in a fu
ote in step 1 to the QA tools in the utils
package/CRAN checks.
That was done this year.
Duncan Murdoch
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 6:58 PM Henrik Bengtsson
wrote:
Without having dug into the details, it could be that one could update
the parser by making a 'return' a keyword an
available. (I think code can prevent gc; maybe your code is doing that
and not re-enabling it?)
Having a reproducible example would help, but I imagine it's not easy to
put one together.
Duncan Murdoch
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
ent(environment(target),
environment(current), ...)
if (is.character(msg))
msg <- paste("Environments:", msg)
}
return(msg)
}
if (is.language(target))
return(all.equal.language(target, current, .
open.account example in the R-intro manual would distinguish between
ross and robert even if the balances matched.
Duncan Murdoch
On 01/12/2020 10:37 a.m., Bill Dunlap wrote:
Probably all.equal.environment's do1() could be enhanced to do the
recursion (and look at the environments' attri
t are somewhat confusing:
> mtcars |> magrittr::debug_pipe |> head
Error: function '::' not supported in RHS call of a pipe
but
mtcars |> magrittr::debug_pipe() |> head()
works.
Overall, I think this is a great addition, though it's going to be
disruptive for a whi
other versions:
but that makes it quite a bit more complicated. (Maybe _ or \. should
be used instead of ., since those are not legal variable names.)
I don't think there should be an attempt to copy magrittr's special
casing of how . is used in determining whether to also include t
On 04/12/2020 12:06 p.m., Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 7:35 PM Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 04/12/2020 8:13 a.m., Hiroaki Yutani wrote:
Error: function '::' not supported in RHS call of a pipe
To me, this error looks much more friendly than magrittr's erro
On 04/12/2020 2:26 p.m., luke-tier...@uiowa.edu wrote:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020, Dénes Tóth wrote:
On 12/4/20 3:05 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
...
It's tempting to suggest it should allow something like
mtcars |> subset(cyl == 4) |> lm(mpg ~ disp, data = .)
which would be
On 04/12/2020 9:11 p.m., luke-tier...@uiowa.edu wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2020, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 04/12/2020 2:26 p.m., luke-tier...@uiowa.edu wrote:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020, Dénes Tóth wrote:
On 12/4/20 3:05 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
...
It's tempting to suggest it should allow some
sense, but hardly gains anything: whereas dropping the anonymous
function definition costs quite a bit. Without special-casing anonymous
function definitions you'd need to enter
mtcars |> (function(x) x)()
or
mtcars |> (\(x) x)()
which are both quite difficult to read.
Duncan Mur
On 06/12/2020 11:34 a.m., Dénes Tóth wrote:
On 12/6/20 4:32 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 06/12/2020 9:43 a.m., Dénes Tóth wrote:
>> Dear Luke,
>>
>> In the meantime I checked the R-syntax branch and the docs; they are
>> very helpful. I would also li
Hadley's answer (#7 here:
https://community.rstudio.com/t/why-cant-ggplot2-use/4372) makes it
pretty clear that he thinks it would have been nice now if he had made
that choice when ggplot2 came out, but it's not worth the effort now to
change it.
Duncan Murdoch
On 06/12/2020 2:34
e than the arithmetic operators, so
x*y %>% f()
is equivalent to x*f(y), not
f(x*y)
as it should "obviously" be. I believe the new |> operator falls
between "| ||" and "~", so
x || y |> f()
is the same as f(x || y), and
x ~ y |> f()
is x ~ f(y).
le for
other calls, but I think it's a justified one.
Duncan Murdoch
* except those that include that the parser flags as syntactically special.
You have
to write 3 |> foo() but don't have to write 3 |> (function(x) x + 1)().
I think you should probably be careful what yo
t is more like
the way "x -> y" is parsed as "y <- x", or "if (x) y" is transformed to
`if`(x, y).
Duncan Murdoch
It would be neater if it was simply so that the class/type of the object on the
right hand side decided what should happen. So we could ha
's a bad idea. I haven't checked, but I
wouldn't be too surprised if "fun" has been used thousands of times in
CRAN packages as the name of a function. So
x |> fun(y)
would mean "fun(x, y)", whereas
x |> fun(y) y+1
would mean (function(y) y+1)(x).
Duncan
On 07/12/2020 12:09 p.m., Peter Dalgaard wrote:
On 7 Dec 2020, at 17:35 , Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 07/12/2020 11:18 a.m., peter dalgaard wrote:
Hmm,
I feel a bit bad coming late to this, but I think I am beginning to side with those who want
"... |> head" to work. And yes
unction, which could be used internally
by lapply and sapply for the same sort of purpose. tidyverse has
rlang::as_function, so they could pretty easily add methods for
as.function if they wanted to allow people to use their shorthand in
*apply functions.
Duncan Murdoch
__
On 08/12/2020 6:21 a.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 07/12/2020 12:26 p.m., luke-tier...@uiowa.edu wrote:
I don't disagree in principle, but the reality is users want shortcuts
and as a result various packages, in particular tidyverse, have been
providing them. Mostly based on formulas, m
't need to choose just one from all the
proposed replacements for anonymous function syntax, we can try them out
and see which ones we like. We might end up with more than one (like we
have at least 4 different high level graphics paradigms!), and that's
not the end of the world.
D
invisibility from the result (which is
a design flaw or bonus, depending on your point of view). So I actually
wouldn't advise this workaround.
Duncan Murdoch
On 09/12/2020 12:45 a.m., Timothy Goodman wrote:
Hi,
I'm a data scientist who routinely uses R in my day-to-day work, for
You might be interested in this blog post by Michael Barrowman:
https://michaelbarrowman.co.uk/post/the-new-base-pipe/
He does some timing comparisons, and the current R-devel implementations
of |> and \() do quite well.
Duncan Murdoch
On 06/12/2020 4:42 a.m., Jan Gorecki wrote:
L
m = TRUE), especially since it has the additional risk that
users can define their own function called "curry".
Duncan Murdoch
The problem with only allowing
x |> mean
and not
x |> mean()
is with additional arguments. However, this can be solved with a
currying function,
On 09/12/2020 10:42 a.m., Jan van der Laan wrote:
On 09-12-2020 16:20, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 09/12/2020 9:55 a.m., Jan van der Laan wrote:
I think only allowing functions on the right hand side (e.g. only the |>
operator and not the |:>) would be enough to handle most cases and
Looks like Sergio Oller took your ambitious approach:
https://github.com/zeehio/ggpipe. It hasn't been updated since 2017, so
there may be some new things in ggplot2 that aren't there yet.
Duncan Murdoch
On 09/12/2020 2:16 p.m., Greg Snow wrote:
Since `+` is already a function w
nly to the |> operator it would be *really* ugly.
My strongest objection to it is the one at the top, though. If I have a
block of lines sitting in my editor that I just finished executing, with
the cursor pointing at the next line, I'd like to know that it didn't
matter whether t
irst part of the
pipeline -- i.e., selecting full lines, but starting after the opening
paren so as not to need to insert a closing paren.
I think I don't understand your workflow enough to comment on this.
Duncan
- Tim
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 12:12 PM Duncan Murdoch <mailto:murdoch
formula(m2) gives
Sepal.Length ~ poly(Sepal.Width, 2, raw = T) + Petal.Length
and all.vars says it returns "a character vector containing all the
names which occur in an expression or call." "T" is a name.
There are good reasons why "R CMD check" warns about using T when you
mean TRUE.
Duncan Murdoch
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
defaults to FALSE.
I think the Rd checks allow you to leave out defaults, but don't allow
you to state them incorrectly, so that's probably why it is left as
blank in the Usage section, and explained in the Arguments section.
Duncan Murdoch
sessionInfo()
R version 4.0.3 (2020
as in formulae
-> ->> rightwards assignment
<- <<- assignment (right to left)
= assignment (right to left)
? help (unary and binary)
(Most of this is taken from ?Syntax, but I added the new operators in
based on the gram.y file). So
A & B => C &
On 21/01/2021 7:51 a.m., Iñaki Ucar wrote:
Minor question: wouldn't the new pipe syntax be worth a minor version
bump?
I don't think I've seen anything to signal that it will end up in 4.0.4.
It's intended for 4.1.0, as far as all the signs show.
Duncan Murdoch
A pack
If you don't hear something from someone in R Core, you should submit
this as a bug report on bugs.r-project.org. (You might not have an
account there; if you don't, someone from R Core will have to give you
one. Feel free to remind them if nothing happens in a few days!)
Duncan M
This is ugly, but I think it's legal, and it doesn't trigger a warning:
output unused parameters as zero-length strings:
msnx(T0, mask = '%1$.1f (SD=%2$.1f)%3$.0s%4$.0s')
Perhaps an example using %.0s could be included to show how to skip a value.
Duncan Murdoch
On
all. (This is after searching rgl sources, with the same
result.) I'd be happy to add something to rgl if you could point me to
an example: it also uses Xlib like R, so once that works I could
propose a patch to R.
Duncan Murdoch
__
R-devel@r-proj
ther R graphics windows in the same group, but
I don't see a way for rgl to know the group_leader that R is using (and
it's probably not worth adding this to the API to be able to request it).
Am I missing an easier solution?
Duncan Murdoch
I decided to copy the way GVim sets
On 23/03/2021 11:54 a.m., Ivan Krylov wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:41:39 -0400
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
It would probably be nice to have rgl windows and other R graphics
windows in the same group, but I don't see a way for rgl to know the
group_leader that R is using (and it's pr
group together (with a bad icon).
I think I'll leave the group_leader in place. I'll think about setting
an icon, but I don't see it as urgent.
Duncan Murdoch
On 23/03/2021 1:36 p.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
It all works now, thanks mostly to some very detailed reading of th
s crammed against the bottom of the screen. I think
this is negative (the usual reason I create them all is to hope to spot
bad changes).
So for a reasonable number of windows the change is an improvement: the
windows appear grouped. For a very large number of window
eger"
))x <- .foo$new(a=1L)## This is OKx$a## This is OK`$`(x, "a")## But this is
not OKi <- "a"`$`(x, i)*
This is really hard to read. Please post it again, but don't use HTML.
Duncan Murdoch
For the last line of code I get this error
*Error in envRefInfe
you can ignore the note, but I'd suspect
multiple listings are more often an error than intentional, and that's
what NOTEs are for.
There may still be a more serious bug here if one of the limits is
ignored; I haven't checked that.
Duncan Murdoch
On 21/04/2021 6:57 a.m., Dénes
7; should
run w/o rec.packages but further checking not.
So, yes, please, you are encouraged to send patches against the
R devel trunk to fix such examples and tests.
I think it would be useful to issue some kind of warning if tests are
skipped. As mentioned earlier, this is impossible i
901 - 1000 of 3114 matches
Mail list logo
