Full_Name: Andrew Clausen
Version: 2.1.0
OS: Debian GNU/Linux
Submission from: (NULL) (71.242.192.73)
Hi,
When I type
hist(x, freq=F)
I get a density function, as I expect. However, if I type
plot(hist(x, freq=F))
then I get the same output as if I had typed:
hist(x, freq=T
Hi Brian,
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 04:34:50AM +, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> Did you check the help page? ?plot.histogram shows plot.histogram has a
> 'freq' argument, and the correct usage is
>
> plot(hist(x), freq=FALSE)
Ah, thanks for the explanation.
I didn't occur to me to check the pl
Hi Martin,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:20:06PM +0100, Martin Maechler wrote:
> AndrewC> I didn't occur to me to check the plot.histogram()
> AndrewC> help page.
>
> [ even though it's prominently mentioned on help(hist) ?? ]
Yes. I expected plot.histogram() was something that no-one
Hi all,
sample() has some well-documented undesirable behaviour.
sample(1:6, 1)
sample(2:6, 1)
...
sample(5:6, 1)
do what you expect, but
sample(6:6, 1)
sample(1:6, 1)
do the same thing.
This behaviour is documented:
If 'x' has length 1, is numeric (in the sense of 'is.numeric') and
Hi all,
I forgot to test my patch! I fixed a few bugs.
Cheers,
Andrew
On 22 March 2010 22:53, Andrew Clausen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> sample() has some well-documented undesirable behaviour.
>
> sample(1:6, 1)
> sample(2:6, 1)
> ...
> sample(5:6, 1)
>
> do what you
It's bad enough that there is a surprise, but even worse
that there is no workaround that my students can understand easily.
Cheers,
Andrew
On 25 March 2010 06:53, Martin Maechler wrote:
>>>>>> "AndrewC" == Andrew Clausen
>>>>>> on Tue, 23 M
Hi all,
I wrote a symbollic differentiation function in R, which can be downloaded
here:
http://www.econ.upenn.edu/~clausen/computing/Deriv.R
http://www.econ.upenn.edu/~clausen/computing/Simplify.R
It is just a prototype. Of course, R already contains two differentiation
Hi all,
I wrote a function called relist, which is an inverse to the existing
unlist function:
http://www.econ.upenn.edu/~clausen/computing/relist.R
Some functions need many parameters, which are most easily represented in
complex structures. Unfortunately, many mathematical functions
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 01:29:11PM -0400, Andrew Clausen wrote:
> R has a function to convert complex objects into a vector
> representation. This file provides an inverse operation called "unlist" to
> convert vectors back to the convenient structural representation.
Oops.
)) === x
>
> 1. relist(x) is the same as x except it gets an additional class "relist".
> 2. unlist(relist(x)) invokes the relist method of unlist on relist(x)
> returning another relist object
> 3. relist(unlist(relist(x))) then recreates relist(x)
>
>
> On 5/1
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:02:56PM +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> In R you rarely need to pass additional arguments in programming as
> lexical scoping can be used to capture them.
You can also use currying, like this:
ll <- function(data) function(params)
{
#
Hi all,
I've written a new version of relist that includes the suggestions from Gabor
and Martin:
http://www.econ.upenn.edu/~clausen/computing/relist.R
The leading example now looks like this:
initial.param <- list(mean=c(0, 1), vcov=cbind(c(1, 1)
Hi all,
For reasons I can't explain, the code I posted worked in my session, but didn't
work when I started a fresh one. standardGeneric() seems to get confused
by defaults for missing arguments. It looks for a "missing" method with
this code:
relist <- function(flesh, skeleton=attr(fle
t;missing") rather than just "numeric".
I have uploaded a new version here:
http://www.econ.upenn.edu/~clausen/computing/relist.R
Cheers,
Andrew
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
gt; would perform the inversion.
>
> I am not sure if the reshape package has any bearing here
> as well.
>
> On 5/22/07, Andrew Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hi Seth,
> >
> >On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 05:15:10PM -0700, Seth Falcon wrote:
> >> I
because it best matches my
current projects.
Here's a quick summary of what I've done:
* implemented my own version of BFGS in R,
http://www.econ.upenn.edu/~clausen/computing/bfgs.zip
* written a wrapper for the GNU Scientific Library's optimization function,
Hi Pat,
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 09:59:57AM +0100, Patrick Burns wrote:
> Sounds like a good project.
Thanks :)
> How much extra overhead are you getting from the
> algorithm being in R?
On the Rosenbrock function (which is very quick to evaluate), here are the
system.time() results:
> system.t
Hi Duncan,
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 09:25:39AM -0400, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> This is interesting work; thanks for doing it. Could I make a
> suggestion? Why not put together a package containing those test
> optimization problems, and offer to include other interesting ones as
> they arise?
Hi Manuel,
My multimin() wrapper will be merged into the Rgsl package. I expect that the
wrapper doesn't do anything special (compared to the rest of Rgsl) to break the
compilation -- you're just having trouble with my very crude and temporary
Makefile.
Does Rgsl work for you?
If it does, you c
Hi Hin-Tak,
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 01:10:36AM +0100, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
> GPL-licensed code dlopen()'ing proprietary-licensed binary-only DLL/so
> is allowed
Do you have any evidence? (eg: something written on www.fsf.org?)
As far as I know, the normal grounds for allowing GPL code to link w
Hi all,
As long as I've used R, add=TRUE hasn't worked in contexts like this:
f <- function(x) x^2
X <- seq(0, 1, by=1/4)
plot(f, col="blue")
plot(X, f(X), col="red", type="l", add=TRUE)
I attached a fix for version 2.6.2.
Cheers,
Andrew
diff --git a/src/library
heers,
Andrew
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 12:08:59PM -0300, Henrique Dallazuanna wrote:
> I think you can use par(new = T) here:
>
> f <- function(x) x^2
> X <- seq(0, 1, by=1/4)
> plot(f, col="blue")
> par(new = T)
> plot(X, f(X), col="red", type="
Hi Duncan,
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 12:11:45PM -0400, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> It has never been claimed that it would work, and as far as I can see,
> it doesn't make anything easier: the last line could be replaced by
>
> lines(X, f(X), col="red")
>
> for more clarity from less typing. So why
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 04:04:08PM -0400, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> Part of the reason I didn't like your patch is that it was incomplete:
> it didn't patch the plot.default.Rd file.
Fair enough -- I wasn't sure whether I was fixing a bug or not. ("..."
spreads the documentation around a bit.)
>
Hi Duncan,
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 08:51:23AM -0400, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> >The add parameter only interacts with other parameters superficially --
> >some parameters of "plot" (like log) are related to the shape of the axes,
> >and should be inherited from what is on the plot already.
>
> I'd
25 matches
Mail list logo
