[Rd] rnorm is not truly random used in the lm function

To whom it may concern, I happened to run the following R code just to check the layout of the output, but found that the code doesn't work the way I thought it should work. '' > lm(rnorm(100) ~ rnorm(100)) Call: lm(formula = rnorm(100) ~ rnorm(100)) Coefficients: (Intercept) -0.07966 Warni

Re: [Rd] rnorm is not truly random used in the lm function

both sides of the ~ sign? By the input literal? Please clarify. Thanks, Victor On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Martin Maechler wrote: > >>>>> Victor Tian > >>>>> on Thu, 3 Aug 2017 09:49:57 -0400 writes: > > > To whom it may concern, >