Folks,
Per a post to StackOverflow, I'm looking for an opinion on whether something
should be documented:
When adding a named item to a list, its guaranteed that the item will be
added to the end of the list.
SO post:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7599349/adding-named-item-to-list-guaranteed
Dirk - I'm having the same issue. Could you provide the details of your
solution?
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 28 January 2012 at 16:52, Uwe Ligges wrote:
> |
> |
> | On 27.01.2012 15:57, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | >
> | > On 12 January 2012 at 12:12, Herv
I don't think that is it. My startup message is currently in .onAttach and
I still see startup message from packages that I have moved from Imports to
Depends.
Dirk?
2012/2/23 Uwe Ligges
>
>
> On 23.02.2012 06:40, Suraj Gupta wrote:
>
>> Dirk - I'm having the same i
= "" )
startupMessage = paste( startupMessage , "MY MESSAGE HERE...left out
for brevity" , sep = "" )
packageStartupMessage( startupMessage )
}
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 24 February 2012 at 00:27, Suraj Gup
("PerformanceAnalytics"**)) # no
message are shown
search() # PerformanceAnalytics is now in the seach list beneath R_Global
as expected
2012/2/24 Uwe Ligges
>
>
> On 24.02.2012 18:02, Suraj Gupta wrote:
>
>> Sorry, let me provide the details:
>> My package has a .onAttach functi
Also, if I just startup a fresh copy of R and I don't load my package then
suppressPackageStartupMessages**( library("PerformanceAnalytics"**)) also
does not produce any messages.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Suraj Gupta wrote:
> Correct, nothing happens in terms of sta
My problem is the same problem that Dirk first asked about. I want to
reduce the verbose noise. I want my Imports to not show any startup
messages when I load my own package.
2012/2/24 Uwe Ligges
>
>
> On 24.02.2012 18:48, Suraj Gupta wrote:
>
>> Correct, nothing happens i
some folks are implementing startup messages via onLoad. The behavior
makes sense. Thanks!
2012/2/24 Uwe Ligges
>
>
> On 24.02.2012 18:53, Uwe Ligges wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 24.02.2012 18:52, Suraj Gupta wrote:
>>
>>> My problem is the same problem tha
