Re: [Rd] FastR

2014-02-12 Thread Michael Haupt
like to point the R developers to the FastR project page, now on BitBucket: https://bitbucket.org/allr. The project mailing list is at https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/fastr/info. Best regards, Michael Haupt -- Dr. Michael Haupt Principal Member of Technical Staff Phone: +49 331 200 7277

Re: [Rd] FastR

2014-02-13 Thread Michael Haupt
ading to much better performance. When built from the BitBucket repository, the default execution model is #2. > So you moved from github (https://github.com/allr/fastr) to BitBucket ? Yes, as the internal infrastructure we're using is 100 % Mercurial. Best regards, Michael Haupt -- D

[Rd] cummax / cummin for complex numbers

2014-07-14 Thread Michael Haupt
7; not defined for complex numbers It may be fixed in R-devel, but I thought I'd mention it to make sure ... Best, Michael -- Dr. Michael Haupt Principal Member of Technical Staff Phone: +49 331 200 7277, Fax: +49 331 200 7561 Oracle Labs Oracle Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG, Schiffba

Re: [Rd] cummax / cummin for complex numbers

2014-07-14 Thread Michael Haupt
erring to cunmax when cunmin was called > and vice verse. > > D. > > On 7/14/14, 8:14 AM, Ben Bolker wrote: >> Michael Haupt oracle.com> writes: >> >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> in R 3.1.0, this is happening: >>> >>&

[Rd] `*tmp*`

2014-08-14 Thread Michael Haupt
` Error: object '*tmp*' not found Confused greetings, Michael -- Dr. Michael Haupt Principal Member of Technical Staff Phone: +49 331 200 7277, Fax: +49 331 200 7561 Oracle Labs Oracle Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG, Schiffbauergasse 14, 14467 Potsdam, Germany _

Re: [Rd] `*tmp*`

2014-08-14 Thread Michael Haupt
tions because, in FastR, we're currently quite closely mirroring the AST interpreter's behaviour for complex assignments - if this is not an absolute must-have, I'd be very happy about being able to apply a much leaner implementation instead. Best, Michael -- Dr. Michael Haupt Princi

[Rd] negative numerics in []

2014-09-04 Thread Michael Haupt
[1] -3 Good. But: > x <- c(1,2,3) > x[-3.1] [1] 1 2 3 Given the documentation, I'd have expected a result of "[1] 1 2", because -3.1 should be coerced to -3 (by virtue of as.integer). What bit do I not get? (I'm using R 3.1.1, if that matters.) Best, Michael --