I'm checking packages under the devel version on OS X
> sessionInfo()
R version 2.12.0 Under development (unstable) (2010-08-08 r52687)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin9.8.0/x86_64 (64-bit)
I install packages via install.packages with type = "source" (I stick
to arch=x86_64). I've had no issues with
Professor Ripley,
>> R version 2.12.0 Under development (unstable) (2010-08-08 r52687)
>> Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin9.8.0/x86_64 (64-bit)
>>
>> I install packages via install.packages with type = "source" (I stick
>> to arch=x86_64). I've had no issues with installs.
>
> What is very strange is
I would like to suggest a Reproducible Research CRAN task view. This
was discussed briefly in one of the useR! sessions this year.
>From quick browse through CRAN, I counted 19 packages that were
associated with Sweave or other methods for reproducible research. I
think that we've gotten to a poin
The link to
http://cran.r-project.org/bin/macosx/R-2.12.1.pkg
on the CRAN page
http://cran.r-project.org/bin/macosx/
is broken. Also, the email address for the webmaster is null (which is
why I'm emailing here).
Thanks,
Max
__
R-devel@r-proje
Peter and Simon,
That was the issue. Thanks,
Max
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Simon Urbanek
wrote:
>
> On Feb 28, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Max Kuhn wrote:
>
>> The link to
>>
>> http://cran.r-project.org/bin/macosx/R-2.12.1.pkg
>>
>> on the CRAN page
>&
I've been updating a package and, when installing a local devel
version, I get an error "object 'confusionMatrix' not found whilst
loading namespace". Looking around online, it appears that this might
be related to loading a specific RData file, but it doesn't seem to be
the case AFAICT.
I've inst
e, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Max Kuhn wrote:
> I've been updating a package and, when installing a local devel
> version, I get an error "object 'confusionMatrix' not found whilst
> loading namespace". Looking around online, it appears that this might
> be related
The CRAN policy page
(https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/policies.html) implies that
there is a formal procedure for orphaning a package but none is
mentioned in the Extensions manual
(https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/R-exts.html).
This page (https://cran.r-project.org/src/contr
il bounces
> The maintainer is unresponsive to requests regarding the package from CRAN
> maintainers
>
> But I think that it is a good idea to include those conditions in the
> manuals.
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:30 AM Max Kuhn wrote:
>>
>> The CRAN policy page
>>
I've had a lot of requests for additions to the reproducible research
task view that fall into a grey area (to me at least).
For example, roxygen2 is a tool that broadly enable reproducibility
but I see it more as a tool for better programming. I'm about to check
in a new version of the task view
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Achim Zeileis
wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Max Kuhn wrote:
>
>> I've had a lot of requests for additions to the reproducible research
>> task view that fall into a grey area (to me at least).
>>
>> For example, rox
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Achim Zeileis wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Max Kuhn wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Achim Zeileis
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Max Kuhn wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've had a lot of requ
Working on the caret package has exposed me to the wide variety of
approaches that different authors have taken to creating predictive
modeling functions (aka machine learning)(aka pattern recognition).
I suspect that many package authors are neophyte R users and are
stumbling through the process
For a package, I need to write a csv version of a data set to an R
object. Right now, I use:
out <- capture.output(
write.table(x,
sep = ",",
na = "?",
fi
My company is trying to manage R installations across a number large
SMP machines. We're thinking out the best way to manage the packages
installs and updates. They would be happy if we could work out RPM's
for package installations (traceable, easily facilitated with existing
sw management tools).
On Dec 1, 2007 3:56 PM, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My understanding is that Michael wants to have the Sweave options in a
> chunk depend on a calculation happening in the underlying R session.
> This is hard to do with hooks, because they are run after the options
> have already b
Everyone,
I've got code in my package that uses LogitBoost from the caTools
package. caTools does not have a namespace.
My package also uses loads RWeka, which has a namespace, and also has
a function called LogitBoost.
After loading both packages, how can I be specific about running the
version
Hadley,
These are good suggestions.
> * Remove infrequently asked questions - e.g. 2.3, 2.4, 7.9, 7.11,
> 7.12, 7.15, 7.19, 7.23, 7.28
I'd like to lobby to keep 7.23 and 7.28. I still get questions about those.
Sampling bias might be an issue: we don't get questions (to r-help)
for those becau
Everyone,
I know that this has been discussed a few times on the list, but I
think that there is a high false positive rate of messages from
findGlobals during R CMD check (I know the help page has that "The
result is an approximation").
Here are two examples of from the caret package:
This func
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Philippe Grosjean
wrote:
> OK, then, I catch the practical point of view that is: nobody will use it
> and we cannot force people to use it. So, it means that we should think
> about tools to *automatically* generate a limited set of entries in the
> CHANGELOG.
Of
> REvolution appear to be offering ParallelR only when bundled with their R
> Enterprise edition. As such it appears to be non-free and closed source.
>http://www.revolution-computing.com/products/parallel-r.php
Have you also looked at:
http://nws-r.sourceforge.net/
The core of their Pa
I wasn't sure where to send this...
On the "What's New" section of the homepage, the "Latest" package link
points towards
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-packages/2008/date.html#end
It should probably point towards 2009.
Thanks,
Max
__
R-devel@r
22 matches
Mail list logo
