Hey Doug,
R is not a product that is provided by a company or any vendor that can be
procured through a vendor e.g. something on a GSA schedule.
Seems like you're caught in the bureaucracy hell hole. I used to help the
USAF, and other DoD members use R when I was at RStudio (now Posit).
I recomm
It looks like to me the class is being removed explicitly due to the use of
as.numeric()
On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 12:04 PM Spencer Graves
wrote:
> Hello, All:
>
>
> The 'head' and 'tail' functions strip the time from a 'ts'
> object.
> Example:
>
>
> > head(presidents)
> [1] NA 87 82 75
Hey folks,
I'm sure many of you all woke to the same message I did: "Please correct
before 2024-07-09 to safely retain your package on CRAN" caused by Non-API
changes to CRAN.
This is quite unexpected as Luke Tierney's June 6th email writes (emphasis
mine):
"An *experimental* *effort* is underw
have been stabilized and begin working towards
remedying them? These WARNs come from R-devel which is, as its name
suggests,
a development version which is vacillating daily.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 12:10 PM wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2024, Josiah Parry wrote:
>
> > Hey folks,
> &g
I wouldn't go so far as to call people who don't want to wholesale attach
namespaces as "nuts."
{survival} is provided via the {censored} R package to integrate into the
{tidymodels} ecosystem.
And the reverse imports of the package is massive! Assuming that each and
every one of them
should attac
Hi all,
I'm new to contributing to r-devel. The trunk of r-devel right now includes
a `check_rust()` function for adherence to CRAN's evolving rust policy (see
commit
https://github.com/r-devel/r-svn/commit/6114d4126434c056b476cbc5db2657536c153d9a
).
As it stands R 4.4.2 will codify CRAN policy o
Thank you, Tomas, for the clarification!
On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 14:59 Tomas Kalibera
wrote:
> On 10/13/24 19:30, Josiah Parry wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm new to contributing to r-devel. The trunk of r-devel right now
> includes
> > a `check_rust()` functi
I’ve been guilty of this myself. I think a check would be good.
In my case I was using the new sort_by() function (I think also 4.1) and a
user was failing to install on R 4.0.
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 11:30 Jan Netík wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a server with R 3.6.3 installed and I struggled a
Other people may be like me where R is the first programming language I
learned.
It took probably ~5/6 years or more to learn what “MD5” is and even longer
to understand what a checksum is and why they’re useful.
I think saying it _explicitly_ is helpful. Maybe saying that 1) the package
was ins
n log for
"Downloading crates." This could be easily circumvented on CRAN and locally
by suppressing stdout/err. But that would be adversarial and I would like
to adhere to the intent of the check.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 9:23 AM Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 2025-03-31 11:50 a.m.,
Please update your Makevars template using the development version of
rextendr.
Please see:
https://github.com/extendr/extendr/releases/tag/extendr-api-v0.8.0
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 18:59 谭显英 wrote:
> Dear R-devel list,
>
>
> I maintain two packages that use Rust code through the "extendr" lib
Brilliant!
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 22:49 谭显英 wrote:
> Thanks. I confirmed the issue has been resolved by following the
> instructions in your link.
>
> Regards,
>
> Xianying Tan (shrektan)
>
>
> Replied Message
> From Josiah Parry
> Date 04/15/20
Well this has surely veered off course!
As the one who filed the BugZilla report, I'd like to redirect the
conversation and provide further context.
The question should be *"how do we get a dialogue started on this bugzilla
issue before the next minor *
*release of R?"*
The current check for Rus
t;
> > All the existing check-regulating env variables ...
> >
> > cd src/library/tools/R
> > grep 'Sys.getenv("_R_CHECK' * | sed -e 's/^.*Sys.getenv(//' | sed -e
> > 's/[,)].*//' | sort | uniq | wc
> >
> >
> > * should CRAN all
Tomas,
Here is a good example of where this functionality would be useful:
https://github.com/R-ArcGIS/arcgislayers/blob/2b29f4c254e7e5a1dadce8d4b0015a70dfae39d4/R/arc-open.R#L19-L56
In order to prevent R CMD check notes I have to use `paste0()` to
concatenate long URLs. If we were able to use `\
ecause it allows for better indentation (as Tomas pointed out). Perhaps a
> pointless email, but sometimes - for these subjective issues - it is
> worthwhile to point out a difference in opinion.
>
> Best,
> Kasper
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 12:27 PM Tomas Kalibera
> wrote:
>
de
- dplyr::if_else:
https://github.com/search?q=%22if_else%28%22+language%3AR&type=code
- kit::iif:
https://github.com/search?q=%2F%28%3F-i%29iif%5C%28%2F+language%3AR+&type=code
On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 8:23 AM Avraham Adler
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 10:55 AM Josiah Parry
> wro
I think the point is not that there needs to be a smaller package for yet
another if-else (https://xkcd.com/927/). It is that if the R-language, as a
whole, had a performant if-else in the base of the language would benefit
**everyone** such that a data.table or dplyr or gtools etc. alternative
wou
18 matches
Mail list logo
